22-28687947-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1582G>A(p.Glu528Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000576 in 1,596,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
4
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.65
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20885828).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1582G>A | p.Glu528Lys | missense_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1582G>A | p.Glu528Lys | missense_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000214 AC: 5AN: 233632Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 3AN XY: 128334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
233632
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
128334
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000575 AC: 83AN: 1444092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000501 AC XY: 36AN XY: 718786
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
83
AN:
1444092
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
718786
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74354
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74354
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 09, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 03, 2024 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 528 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Glu528Lys). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and colorectal cancer (PMID: 23960188, 28135145, 34326862). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142361). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 17, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 29, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 21, 2022 | The p.E528K variant (also known as c.1582G>A), located in coding exon 14 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1582. The glutamic acid at codon 528 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported in the germline of one Chinese individual diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (de Miranda NF et al. J. Exp. Med. 2013 Aug;210:1729-42). In addition, this alteration behaved as functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum. Mutat., 2019 05;40:631-648). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 03, 2021 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 528 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. An experimental functional study has been shown this variant to be neutral in a yeast based DNA damage repair assay (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with colorectal cancer in the literature (PMID: 28135145). This variant has been identified in 8/265030 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 17, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 23, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with colon cancer and lymphoma (de Miranda et al., 2013; Yurgelun et al., 2017); Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: cell growth and proliferation after DNA damage similar to wild type (Delimitsou et al., 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23960188, 28135145, 28211887, 31398194, 32906215, 30851065) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 31, 2023 | In the published literature, the variant has been reported in an individual with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28135145 (2017)). A yeast functional assay found that this variant had a benign effect on protein function (PMID: 30851065 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00004 (5/124096 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 05, 2021 | Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1582G>A (p.Glu528Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.1e-05 in 233632 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1582G>A has been reported in the literature as a germline variant in individuals with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and colorectal cancer (e.g. deMiranda_2013, Yurgelun_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, indicating that the variant showed no damaging effects in a yeast-based assay (e.g. Delimitsou_2019). Six other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories cited the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Feb 14, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D;.;D;.;D;D;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;L;.;L;.;L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;.;N;N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Polyphen
P;P;P;.;P;D;P;D;P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at