22-28689124-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1542+11T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00299 in 1,568,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 153 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 81 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 72 hom. )
Consequence
CHEK2
NM_007194.4 intron
NM_007194.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.61
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 22-28689124-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28689124-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 140812.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-28689124-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr22-28689124-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0541 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1542+11T>A | intron_variant | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1542+11T>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0159 AC: 2413AN: 152182Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2413
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00401 AC: 935AN: 233208Hom.: 35 AF XY: 0.00297 AC XY: 380AN XY: 128106
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
935
AN:
233208
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
380
AN XY:
128106
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00160 AC: 2271AN: 1416654Hom.: 72 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00137 AC XY: 972AN XY: 706994
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2271
AN:
1416654
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
972
AN XY:
706994
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0159 AC: 2416AN: 152300Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0152 AC XY: 1130AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2416
AN:
152300
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1130
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 15, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Feb 16, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 14, 2012 | General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 06, 2015 | - - |
CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CHEK2 c.1542+11T>A variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB or Zhejiang Colon Cancer databases. The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs17881716) as "With Likely benign allele", in ClinVar (classified as benign 2x, likely benign 2x), and Clinvitae (classified as benign 2x, likely benign 2x). The variant was identified in control databases in 1364 of 259656 chromosomes (43 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 1294 of 22484 chromosomes (freq: 0.06). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at