22-28689222-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1462-7C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000163 in 1,538,382 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1462-7C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1462-7C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000171 AC: 4AN: 233246Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000312 AC XY: 4AN XY: 128288
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000159 AC: 22AN: 1386244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000187 AC XY: 13AN XY: 693580
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74316
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 03, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 06, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 08, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | CHEK2: PM2:Supporting, BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 27, 2022 | To the best of our knowledge, the variant has not been reported in individuals with CHEK2-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00004 (5/123914 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on CHEK2 mRNA splicing yielded inconclusive findings . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 06, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 14, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 19, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at