22-28695752-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.1217G>A​(p.Arg406His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,613,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

1
1
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.53
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025272042).
BP6
Variant 22-28695752-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28695752-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142760.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=5}. Variant chr22-28695752-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1217G>A p.Arg406His missense_variant 11/15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1217G>A p.Arg406His missense_variant 11/151 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000283
AC:
71
AN:
250750
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000339
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135650
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000206
AC:
301
AN:
1461410
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000237
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
727040
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000282
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000116
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000831
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000247
AC:
30
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneAug 13, 2024According to the ACMG SVI adaptation criteria we chose these criteria: BP4 (supporting benign): REVEL 0.14, BS1 (strong benign): laut Canvig - => ATM-VCEP: FAF > 0,5%; South asians: 0,16% in gnomAD V2 und V4, 0,1% in gnomAD V3 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer ResearchMay 01, 2019- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 23, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 13, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 16, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 18, 2018This variant is denoted CHEK2 c.1217G>A at the cDNA level, p.Arg406His (R406H) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Histidine (CGT>CAT). This variant was observed in several individuals with breast cancer (Novak 2008, Soumittra 2009, Caminsky 2016, Tung 2016) and in at least one individual with a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps (Yurgelun 2015), but has also been observed in healthy controls (Novak 2008). In a yeast complementation assay, cells transformed with this variant demonstrated cell growth and survival comparable to wild type (Yilmaz 2014). Although this variant was observed in large population cohorts, data in this region of CHEK2 are not considered reliable due to high pseudogene homology (Lek 2016). CHEK2 Arg406His is located in the kinase domain (Cai 2009, Roeb 2012). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether CHEK2 Arg406His is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 30, 2024The CHEK2 c.1217G>A (p.Arg406His) variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 18706089 (2008), 19656415 (2009), 25186627 (2015), 26898890 (2016), 26976419 (2016), 30303537 (2019), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CHEK2)) and suspected of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754 (2015)). This variant has also been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), 31050813 (2019), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CHEK2)). In addition, functional studies suggest that the variant protein has normal DNA damage repair activity (PMID: 30851065 (2019), Yilmaz et al (2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2014.54046) and intermediate to normal kinase activity (PMID: 31050813 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0016 (50/30616 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 02, 2024Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1217G>A (p.Arg406His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Protein kinase domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 250750 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0016 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00031), however this data must be interpreted with caution as the sequencing techology utalized does not distinguish between this gene and highly homologous pseudogenes. c.1217G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (examples- Soumitra_2009, Tung_2016, Girard_2019) and in an individual with Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on CHEK2 function in yeast and find no damaging effects for the variant (Yilmaz_2014, Delimitsou_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19656415, 25980754, 25186627, 26976419, 30851065, 30303537). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJan 17, 2023- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CHEK2 p.Arg406His variant was identified in 12 of 9230 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer, lynch syndrome and was present in 22 of 13146 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Caminsky 2016, Novak 2008, Soumittra 2009, Tung 2016, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs200649225) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae; as uncertain significance by GeneDx), Clinvitae, MutDB, and Zhejiang University databases. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in control databases in 74 of 276652 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 23964 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 3 of 34406 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 18 of 126232 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 52 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.002); but not in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. Yeast cells carrying the R406H variant grew at a rate similar to those carrying the wild type CHEK2, in In vitro complementation assay by Yilmaz (2014), and suggests the variant does not abrogate the function of CHEK2. The p.Arg406 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.15
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.083
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.64
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
.;D;.;D;.;D;D;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.054
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L;.;L;.;L;.;L;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;N;N;.;N;N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.062
T;T;T;.;T;D;.;D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.086
T;D;T;.;T;T;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.46
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
3.5
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200649225; hg19: chr22-29091740; COSMIC: COSV100101253; COSMIC: COSV100101253; API