22-28695752-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1217G>A(p.Arg406His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,613,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1217G>A | p.Arg406His | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1217G>A | p.Arg406His | missense_variant | 11/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000283 AC: 71AN: 250750Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000339 AC XY: 46AN XY: 135650
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000206 AC: 301AN: 1461410Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000237 AC XY: 172AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne | Aug 13, 2024 | According to the ACMG SVI adaptation criteria we chose these criteria: BP4 (supporting benign): REVEL 0.14, BS1 (strong benign): laut Canvig - => ATM-VCEP: FAF > 0,5%; South asians: 0,16% in gnomAD V2 und V4, 0,1% in gnomAD V3 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 23, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 13, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 16, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 18, 2018 | This variant is denoted CHEK2 c.1217G>A at the cDNA level, p.Arg406His (R406H) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Histidine (CGT>CAT). This variant was observed in several individuals with breast cancer (Novak 2008, Soumittra 2009, Caminsky 2016, Tung 2016) and in at least one individual with a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps (Yurgelun 2015), but has also been observed in healthy controls (Novak 2008). In a yeast complementation assay, cells transformed with this variant demonstrated cell growth and survival comparable to wild type (Yilmaz 2014). Although this variant was observed in large population cohorts, data in this region of CHEK2 are not considered reliable due to high pseudogene homology (Lek 2016). CHEK2 Arg406His is located in the kinase domain (Cai 2009, Roeb 2012). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether CHEK2 Arg406His is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 30, 2024 | The CHEK2 c.1217G>A (p.Arg406His) variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 18706089 (2008), 19656415 (2009), 25186627 (2015), 26898890 (2016), 26976419 (2016), 30303537 (2019), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CHEK2)) and suspected of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754 (2015)). This variant has also been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), 31050813 (2019), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CHEK2)). In addition, functional studies suggest that the variant protein has normal DNA damage repair activity (PMID: 30851065 (2019), Yilmaz et al (2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2014.54046) and intermediate to normal kinase activity (PMID: 31050813 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0016 (50/30616 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 02, 2024 | Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1217G>A (p.Arg406His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Protein kinase domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 250750 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0016 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00031), however this data must be interpreted with caution as the sequencing techology utalized does not distinguish between this gene and highly homologous pseudogenes. c.1217G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (examples- Soumitra_2009, Tung_2016, Girard_2019) and in an individual with Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on CHEK2 function in yeast and find no damaging effects for the variant (Yilmaz_2014, Delimitsou_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19656415, 25980754, 25186627, 26976419, 30851065, 30303537). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 17, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CHEK2 p.Arg406His variant was identified in 12 of 9230 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer, lynch syndrome and was present in 22 of 13146 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Caminsky 2016, Novak 2008, Soumittra 2009, Tung 2016, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs200649225) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae; as uncertain significance by GeneDx), Clinvitae, MutDB, and Zhejiang University databases. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in control databases in 74 of 276652 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 23964 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 3 of 34406 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 18 of 126232 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 52 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.002); but not in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. Yeast cells carrying the R406H variant grew at a rate similar to those carrying the wild type CHEK2, in In vitro complementation assay by Yilmaz (2014), and suggests the variant does not abrogate the function of CHEK2. The p.Arg406 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at