22-28695789-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PP3_Strong

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.1180G>A​(p.Glu394Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,613,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

14
4
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.85
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.967

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1180G>A p.Glu394Lys missense_variant 11/15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1180G>A p.Glu394Lys missense_variant 11/151 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000199
AC:
5
AN:
251066
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135722
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000753
AC:
11
AN:
1461598
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727120
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000306
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000480
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 14, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 28, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 394 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function. Functional studies have shown this variant to be damaging to protein function in in vitro and cell based kinase assays (PMID: 31050813, 33606978) and in a DNA damage repair assay in yeast (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in one individual each affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31050813), prostate cancer (PMID: 37842866) and breast, ovarian or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 34026625). This variant also has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID CHEK2_000345). This variant has been identified in 5/251066 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Aug 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 07, 2023The p.E394K variant (also known as c.1180G>A), located in coding exon 10 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1180. The glutamic acid at codon 394 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration behaved as non-functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum Mutat, 2019 05;40:631-648). Additionally, this alteration was identified in 1/1928 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients and 0/3360 population-matched controls. In a functional assay included in this study, this variant was reported as non-functional in both in vitro kinase and human-cell based assays of KAP1 phosphorylation (Kleiblova P et al. Int. J. Cancer, 2019 Oct;145:1782-1797). This alteration was reported as functionally impaired in a study assessing CHEK2-complementation through quantification of KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells (Stolarova L et al. Clin Cancer Res, 2023 Aug;29:3037-3050). Finally, this variant demonstrated enrichment behavior in the presence of doxorubicin and olaparib and reduced expression of CHK2 in a drug sensitivity assay performed in MCF10A -BE3 cells with CRISPR-introduced variants (Cuella-Martin R et al. Cell, 2021 Feb;184:1081-1097.e19). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 19, 2023This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 394 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Glu394Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs587780169, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 30303537, 31050813, 31784482, 35220195). This variant is also known as c.1309G>A (p.Glu437Lys). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 128048). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065, 31409080). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsOct 16, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterMay 31, 2023a variant of uncertain significance in the CHEK2 gene. This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 394 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Glu394Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs587780169, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 30303537, 31050813, 31784482). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 128048).this alteration is predicted to be pathogenic computational verdict based on 20 pathogenic predictions from BayesDel_addAF, DANN, DEOGEN2, EIGEN, FATHMM-MKL, LIST-S2, M-CAP, MVP, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, REVEL , SIFT , CADD, MutPred , LRT , SIFT4G , REVEL , MetaRNN and Polyphen2 vs non benign prediction. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065, 31409080). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the CHEK2 gene cause autosomal dominant susceptibility to breast cancer (OMIM 114480). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneDec 19, 2023. According to the ACMG standard criteria we chose these criteria: PS3 (strong pathogenic): Deleterious in : Stolarova et al 2023 (PMID: 37449874), Kleiblova et al 2019 (PMID: 31050813), Delimitsou et al 2019 (PMID: 30851065), PM2 (supporting pathogenic): popmax: AFR popmax AF:2.41220e-05, PP3 (supporting pathogenic): REVEL: 0.864, BayesDEL:0.394329 -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 21, 2023Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1180G>A (p.Glu394Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251066 control chromosomes. c.1180G>A has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing and in case control studies of individuals affected with breast cancer (example, Doddato_2021, Girard_2019, Bora_2022, Kleibova_2019). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in in-vivo characterization as damaging in a yeast functional assay evaluating ability to repair methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) induced DNA damage (example, Delimitsou_2019). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 24, 2021Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Published functional studies demonstrate damaging effects: Reduced kinase activity and DNA damage response (Delimitsou 2019, Kleiblova 2019); Observed in an individual with breast cancer (Kleiblova 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18571837, 24573554, 22578220, 23856246, 21765476, 30851065, 31050813, 30303537, 31398194) -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CHEK2 p.Glu394Lys variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs587780169) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified uncertain significance by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics and Invitae), Clinvitae (3x), Cosmic (2x in a malignant melanoma and lymphoid neoplasm), and in control databases in 5 of 245908 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include European Non-Finnish in 3 of 111386 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 9846 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); it was not observed in the African, “Other”, Latino, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Glu394 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the Lys variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Bone osteosarcoma;C2931456:Familial prostate cancer;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsFeb 17, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.99
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.40
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.39
CADD
Pathogenic
31
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.50
D;.;D;.;D;.;D;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.1
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.96
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
.;D;.;D;.;D;D;D;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.23
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.97
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.93
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.8
H;.;H;.;H;.;H;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.74
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.9
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.86
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.99
MutPred
0.91
Gain of methylation at E394 (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of methylation at E394 (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of methylation at E394 (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of methylation at E394 (P = 0.0034);.;.;
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
1.0
D
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.99
gMVP
0.98

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780169; hg19: chr22-29091777; COSMIC: COSV60423627; COSMIC: COSV60423627; API