22-28711938-TC-TCC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Moderate
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.762dupG(p.Lys255GlufsTer17) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R254R) has been classified as Likely benign. Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 frameshift
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- CHEK2-related cancer predispositionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- acute myeloid leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The c.762dupG pathogenic mutation, located in coding exon 5 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a duplication of G at nucleotide position 762, causing a translational frameshift with a predicted alternate stop codon. Since frameshifts are typically deleterious in nature, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation (ACMG Recommendations for Standards for Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variations. Revision 2007. Genet Med. 2008;10:294). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at