22-28711946-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The ENST00000404276.6(CHEK2):c.755G>A(p.Ser252Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000223 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S252G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000404276.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.755G>A | p.Ser252Asn | missense_variant | 6/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.755G>A | p.Ser252Asn | missense_variant | 6/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000637 AC: 16AN: 251342Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000662 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000212 AC: 31AN: 1461638Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152270Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 09, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 13, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 02, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 28, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 11, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 04, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 05, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast, pancreatic, esophageal, and other cancers, but also in healthy controls (Momozawa et al., 2018; Ohmoto et al., 2018; Deng et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Dorling et al., 2021; Wagener et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30826992, 36468172, 19782031, 22419737, 30833958, 30287823, 26928463, 27997549, 34570441, 36243179, 32091409, 33471991, 32566746, 31867841, 29667044, 37377590) - |
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 30, 2020 | Variant summary: CHEK2 c.755G>A (p.Ser252Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 298804 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00087 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00031), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.755G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, or Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Ohmoto_2018, Momozawa_2018, Deng_2019, Chen_2019). A large case-control study in Japanese patients with breast cancer showed that odds ratio of this variant is 1.4 (95%CI=0.6-3.1), suggesting that this variant is unlikely to associate with the disease. Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported (TP53 c.743G>A , p.Arg248Gln), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign n=1, VUS n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at