22-28724973-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.592+4A>G variant causes a splice donor region, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,613,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHEK2
NM_007194.4 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_007194.4 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.1973
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.67
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.592+4A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.592+4A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251308Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135862
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251308
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135862
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000253 AC: 37AN: 1461724Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
37
AN:
1461724
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
727168
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74322
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74322
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Jun 07, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Dec 15, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 15, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 23, 2023 | This sequence change falls in intron 4 of the CHEK2 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the CHEK2 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs375905418, gnomAD 0.004%). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with breast, ovarian, and/or prostate cancer (PMID: 2936834, 32095738). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 186130). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 27, 2023 | Published functional studies demonstrate leaky splicing, with similar proportions of transcripts demonstrating exon skipping or no splice impact in a minigene assay (Sanoguera-Miralles et al., 2023); In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29368341, 2936834, 32095738, 37725924) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 04, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 06, 2020 | This variant causes an A to G nucleotide substitution at the +4 position of intron 4 of the CHEK2 gene. To our knowledge, RNA functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/282706 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 22, 2022 | The c.592+4A>G intronic variant results from an A to G substitution 4 nucleotides after coding exon 3 in the CHEK2 gene. This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This alteration was seen in a cohort of unselected patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer (Isaacsson Velho P et al. Prostate, 2018 04;78:401-407). In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will not have any significant effect on splicing. RNA studies have demonstrated that this alteration results in an incomplete splice defect involving exons excluded from naturally occurring transcripts; the clinical impact of this abnormal splicing is unknown at this time (Ambry internal data). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 28, 2021 | Variant summary: CHEK2 c.592+4A>G alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Two predict the variant weakens a 5' donor site. One predict the variant abolishes a 5' splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251308 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.592+4A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected prostate cancer (Isaacsson Velho_2018) and breast/ovarian cancer (Bradbury_2018), without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CHEK2 c.592+4A>G variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs375905418) as "With Uncertain significance allele", and in ClinVar database (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, GeneDx, Color Genomics and Counsyl). The variant was identified in control databases in 5 of 277146 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), European in 4 of 126666 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The c.592+4A>G variant is located in the 5' splice region but does not affect the invariant +1 and +2 positions. However, positions +3 to +6 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at