Menu
GeneBe

22-28725013-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 1P and 1B. PP3BP6

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.556A>C(p.Asn186His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,613,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N186D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

4
11
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:19B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.73
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.756
BP6
Variant 22-28725013-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28725013-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141977.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=12, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr22-28725013-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.556A>C p.Asn186His missense_variant 4/15 ENST00000404276.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.556A>C p.Asn186His missense_variant 4/151 NM_007194.4 P2O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152100
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000597
AC:
15
AN:
251420
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000515
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000150
AC:
219
AN:
1461846
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000140
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152100
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000942
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74300
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000226
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:19Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:9Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 18, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024CHEK2: BS3:Supporting -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 28, 2023Identified in individuals with breast and other cancers as well as in controls, and segregation was incomplete in one breast cancer family (Tung et al., 2015; Decker et al., 2017; Girard et al., 2019; Hilbers et al., 2020; Song et al., 2021); Published functional studies suggest no damaging effect: no impact on kinase activity in a mouse ES cell-based system and growth rates similar to wild type following DNA damage in a yeast-based assay (Delimitsou et al., 2019; Boonen et al., 2022); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26094658, 30303537, 28873162, 28825729, 28779002, 32383162, 30374176, 32546565, 30851065, 25186627, 34903604, 19782031, 22419737) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 09, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 01, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 24, 2024This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 186 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Asn186His). This variant is present in population databases (rs146198085, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and meningioma (PMID: 26094658, 30303537, 30374176, 32383162, 34903604). This variant is also known as c.685T>G (p.Asn229His). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141977). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065, 34903604). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJul 27, 2022_x000D_ Criteria applied: PM2_SUP, PP3 -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 13, 2022Variant summary: CHEK2 c.556A>C (p.Asn186His) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6e-05 in 251420 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (6e-05 vs 0.00031), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.556A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example Aloraifi_2015, Tung_2015, Girard_2019). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. It has also been reported among women older than age 70 years who have never had cancer in the FLOSSIES database. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1 c.2359dupG, p.Glu787GlyfsX3 (Tung_2015); BRCA1 c.130T>A, p.Cys44Ser, at our laboratory), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Delimitsou_2019). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant in an in-vivo, yeast based, functional assay. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=7, likely benign, n=1). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant retained its classification as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 09, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with histidine at codon 186 of the CHEK2 protein. this variant is also known as p.Asn229His in the literature based on an alternate transcript NM_001005735. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown the mutant protein to exhibit normal CHEK2 protein expression and function (PMID: 30851065, 34903604). This variant has been reported in two individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627, 26094658). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant has been observed in 27/60439 individuals affected with breast cancer and 15/53446 controls (OR=1.592, 95%CI 0.847 to 2.993; PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 19/282804 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 30, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C1836482:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
CHEK2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 02, 2023The CHEK2 c.556A>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn186His. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer and an individual undergoing genetic testing (Supplement, Tung et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25186627; Table S1, referred to as c.685T>G, p.Asn229His, Aloraifi et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26094658; Table S3, Girard et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30303537; Table S1, Tsai et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30374176). In vivo experimental investigation using a yeast based assay suggest this variant is benign (Table 1, Delimitsou et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30851065). This variant is reported in 0.012% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/22-29121001-T-G). It is interpreted as uncertain significance by the vast majority of submitters to ClinVar (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/141977/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Endometrial carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CHEK2 p.Asn186His variant was identified in 1 of 208 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer and was not identified in 202 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Aloraifi 2015). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146198085) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, in ClinVar (classified with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity: likely benign by Laboratory Corporation of America; and uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Invitae, Counsyl, Fulgent Genetics and Color Genomics Inc), Clinvitae (4x), Cosmic (1x in a wilms tumour), and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x), but was not found in MutDB. The variant was also identified in control databases in 18 of 277188 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and European Non-Finnish in 15 of 126684 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Asn186 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of the variant His to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.38
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.017
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.030
Cadd
Uncertain
26
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.60
D;.;D;D;.;D;.;.;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.66
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.60
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.057
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.76
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.71
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;M;M;M;.;M;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.4
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.71
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0090
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;.
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.52
D
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.93
gMVP
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146198085; hg19: chr22-29121001; COSMIC: COSV60416123; COSMIC: COSV60416123; API