22-28725030-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM5BP4_Moderate

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.539G>A​(p.Arg180His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000558 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R180C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

1
9
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:16B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr22-28725031-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22597292).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkc.539G>A p.Arg180His missense_variant Exon 4 of 15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkc.539G>A p.Arg180His missense_variant Exon 4 of 15 1 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000658
AC:
10
AN:
151996
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000967
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000597
AC:
15
AN:
251406
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000528
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000547
AC:
80
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000509
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000603
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000672
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000964
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000114
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:16Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:7
Oct 27, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 02, 2019
Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.539G>A variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer and neuroblastoma (Sodha 2002, Dong 2003, Pugh 2013, Pearlman 2016). The c.539G>A variant has an overall allele frequency of 0.00006 in the Broad Institute ExAC Browser (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), and is more common in African American populations (Lek 2016). In silico analyses indicate this is an evolutionarily conserved residue. Thus, it is unknown at this time whether this variant increases cancer risk. -

Dec 14, 2022
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

_x000D_ Criteria applied: PS3_MOD, PM2_SUP, PP3, BP5 -

Mar 09, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 180 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Arg180His). This variant is present in population databases (rs137853009, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with prostate cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and neuroblastoma (PMID: 12454775, 12533788, 23334666, 27978560, 30086788, 31159747, 32923877). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 5596). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on CHEK2 function (PMID: 16982735, 22114986). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Sep 08, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:4Benign:1
May 08, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.R180H variant (also known as c.539G>A), located in coding exon 3 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 539. The arginine at codon 180 is replaced by histidine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant has been identified in individuals diagnosed with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer (Sodha N et al. Br. J. Cancer. 2002 Dec;87:1445-8; Dong X et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003 Feb;72:270-80; Pearlman R et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr;3:464-471; Greville-Heygate SL et al. JCO Precis Oncol, 2020 May;4:). Functional analyses of the p.R180H allele have supported pathogenicity, with most studies demonstrating low or intermediate levels of functional impairment (Sodha N et al. Cancer Res. 2006 Sep;66:8966-70; Delimitsou A et al. Hum. Mutat., 2019 05;40:631-648; Kleiblova P et al. Int. J. Cancer, 2019 10;145:1782-1797; Desrichard A et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Nov;13:R119). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -

Mar 21, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 23, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 10, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified Uncertain:2
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 26, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CHEK2 c.539G>A (p.Arg180His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.3e-05 in 253624 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not higher than predicted for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (6.3e-05 vs 0.00031), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.539G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with various types of cancers including breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer (Desrichard_2011, Dong_2003, Pearlman_2016, Penkert_2018, Sodha_2002, van Puijenbroek_2005, Young_2016, Kleiblova_2019, Tsaousis_2019, Pereira_2022). Functional studies indicate that the variant slightly effects protein expression, stability and kinase activity as measured by activation in response to etoposide induced DNA damage (Sodha_2002). However, this data does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (ATM c.5932G>T, p.Glu1978Ter; CHEK2 c.1100delC, p.Thr367fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Penkert_2018 and Sodha_2002). Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=9) and likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Malignant tumor of prostate Pathogenic:1
Feb 01, 2003
OMIM
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

not provided Uncertain:1
Jan 08, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Observed in individuals with CHEK2-related and other cancers, some of whom had pathogenic variants in other genes (PMID: 12454775, 12533788, 23334666, 27978560, 30086788, 32923877); Published functional studies demonstrate normal phosphorylation in response to DNA damage, but partially reduced protein expression, stability, and kinase activity when compared to wild type (PMID: 16982735, 22114986, 30851065, 31050813); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25629968, 18167186, 21244692, 18085035, 19782031, 15239132, 22385513, 16982735, 12454775, 12533788, 23334666, 22114986, 26787654, 15818573, 27978560, 28055978, 30851065, 30086788, 31050813, 31159747, 22419737, 32923877, 35980532, 36980535, 36983691, 33471991) -

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 p.Arg180His variant was identified in 6 of 1998 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from individuals or families with breast, prostate, neuroblastoma and colorectal cancer and was present in 1 of 846 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Sodha 2002, Dong 2003, Pearlman 2017, Pugh 2013, Penkert 2018). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs137853009) as “with pathogenic, uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as "uncertain significance by Invitae and 5 others, "pathogenic" by OMIM and "likely benign" by Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 18 of 277,176 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 24,028 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), Latino in 9 of 34,420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 7 of 126,672 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006); it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. In response to DNA damage, cells expressing the p.Arg180His variant resembled wild type by demonstrating normal levels of phosphorylation and proper oligomerization (Sodha 2006). In another study, a recombinant protein expressing the variant reduced kinase activity, but did not completely abolish the protein’s function (Desrichard 2011). Additionally, the p.Arg180His variant co-occurred with pathogenic variants in both the same gene (CHEK2 c.1100delC) and the ATM gene (p.Glu1978X) in breast cancer patients (Sodha 2002, Penkert 2018). The p.Arg180 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
May 13, 2024
German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

According to the ACMG SVI adaptation criteria we chose this criterion: BS3 (strong benign): Kleibova und Stolarova: functional, (Delimitsou 2019: intermed; Sodha 2006: fully activated but reduced expression levels and less stable) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.082
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.18
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.54
D;.;D;D;.;D;.;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.77
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
.;D;.;.;D;D;.;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.045
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.23
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.093
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;L;L;L;.;L;L;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.64
Sift
Benign
0.041
D;D;D;D;T;.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.031
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.13
B;B;B;B;B;B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.56
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.46

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137853009; hg19: chr22-29121018; COSMIC: COSV60417374; COSMIC: COSV60417374; API