22-28725277-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.410G>A(p.Arg137Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R137G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- CHEK2-related cancer predispositionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- acute myeloid leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000175 AC: 44AN: 251312 AF XY: 0.000184 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000115 AC: 168AN: 1461808Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 78AN XY: 727202 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74294 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
CHEK2: BP4, BS3:Supporting -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:5
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
- -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
Variant summary: CHEK2 c.410G>A (p.Arg137Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Forkhead-associated (FHA) domain (IPR000253) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 270830 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00049 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.00031), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.410G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example, Bell_2007, Desrichard_2011, LeCalvez-Kelm_2011, Sodha_2002, Yorczyk_2014, Tung_2016, Momozawa_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been observed at our laboratory (BRCA1 c.1960A>T, p.Lys654X; APC c.4647delA, p.Glu1550fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Bell_2007, Desrichard_2011, Roeb_2012, Sodha_2006, Delimitsou_2019). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (expression, stability, kinase activity and yeast-based functional assay based on ability to repair MMS induced DNA damage and resume cell growth and proliferation). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a majority consensus as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at