22-28725287-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM1BP4

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):ā€‹c.400G>Cā€‹(p.Asp134His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

8
11

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.33
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain FHA (size 62) in uniprot entity CHK2_HUMAN there are 10 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (83%) in NM_007194.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.275586).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.400G>C p.Asp134His missense_variant 3/15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.400G>C p.Asp134His missense_variant 3/151 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251330
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135828
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000821
AC:
12
AN:
1461816
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000825
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
727198
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74324
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000564
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsSep 03, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 134 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Asp134His). This variant is present in population databases (rs372874441, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with colorectal cancer (PMID: 30730459). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 128072). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMGZ Medical Genetics CenterFeb 25, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 19, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 06, 2022This missense variant replaces aspartic acid with histidine at codon 134 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has shown that this variant does not impact CHEK2 protein function in a growth complementation assay in yeast (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in a few individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 28779002, 33471991). This variant has been identified in 6/282722 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 27, 2023The p.D134H variant (also known as c.400G>C), located in coding exon 2 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 400. The aspartic acid at codon 134 is replaced by histidine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been detected in a patient with colorectal cancer at age 41 that showed proficient MMR protein staining on immunohistochemistry and with a family history meeting Bethesda criteria (You YN et al. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019 04;62:429-437). This alteration has also been reported in 2/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 0/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439), and in at least one subject in a study of 13087 breast cancer cases and 5488 control individuals in the UK (Decker B et al. J Med Genet, 2017 11;54:732-741). This variant was also observed in 1/3251 individuals who met eligibility criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (Lerner-Ellis J et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2021 Mar;147:871-879). This alteration behaved as functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum Mutat, 2019 05;40:631-648). This alteration was also reported as functional in a study assessing CHEK2-complementation through quantification of KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells (Stolarova L et al. Clin Cancer Res, 2023 Aug;29:3037-3050). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 18, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000023 (3/129046 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in affected individuals with colorectal cancer (PMID: 30730459 (2019)) and breast cancer (PMID: 28779002 (2017)), as well as in two breast cancer cases in a large scale breast cancer association study (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CHEK2)). A yeast based assay found that this variant had a comparable growth rate to the wild type (PMID: 30851065 (2019)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 10, 2020Observed in an individual with colon cancer (You 2019); Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: normal cell growth after DNA damage (Delimitsou 2019); Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30730459, 30851065) -
Familial cancer of breast;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 03, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.30
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.028
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.10
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.29
T;.;T;T;.;T;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.25
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.38
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
.;D;.;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.050
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.28
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.044
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;L;L;L;.;L;L;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.58
N;N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.054
T;T;T;T;D;.;T;D;D;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T;T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;.;.
Polyphen
0.86
P;D;P;P;D;P;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.43
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.081
ClinPred
0.42
T
GERP RS
4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs372874441; hg19: chr22-29121275; API