22-30263945-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_020530.6(OSM):c.697C>A(p.Arg233Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000158 in 1,521,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R233H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020530.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020530.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.697C>A | p.Arg233Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000215781.2 | P13725 | ||
| OSM | TSL:3 | c.634C>A | p.Arg212Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000383893.1 | B5MCX1 | ||
| OSM | TSL:3 | c.*491C>A | downstream_gene | N/A | ENSP00000384543.1 | B5MC70 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000390 AC: 7AN: 179698 AF XY: 0.0000528 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000168 AC: 23AN: 1369522Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 12AN XY: 671612 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at