22-36282736-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.5815G>A​(p.Ala1939Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,613,790 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A1939A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0047 ( 10 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00089 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.637

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • May-Hegglin anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0027503371).
BP6
Variant 22-36282736-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36282736-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 178424.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00466 (710/152366) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0157 (654/41588). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0147. There are 10 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 329 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 710 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkc.5815G>A p.Ala1939Thr missense_variant Exon 41 of 41 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkc.5815G>A p.Ala1939Thr missense_variant Exon 41 of 41 1 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00465
AC:
708
AN:
152248
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0157
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00121
AC:
303
AN:
250892
AF XY:
0.000885
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000887
AC:
1297
AN:
1461424
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000824
AC XY:
599
AN XY:
727012
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0168
AC:
561
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000850
AC:
38
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
11
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52968
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
9
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000483
AC:
537
AN:
1112002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00233
AC:
141
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.473
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
76
153
229
306
382
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00466
AC:
710
AN:
152366
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00441
AC XY:
329
AN XY:
74522
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0157
AC:
654
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
23
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5196
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000441
AC:
30
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
72
109
145
181
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.00532
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0143
AC:
63
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.00143
AC:
173
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Apr 30, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala1939Thr in Exon 41 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.4% (52/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs115031369). -

Nov 13, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

MYH9-related disorder Benign:2
Dec 16, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Oct 18, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.29
DANN
Benign
0.79
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.040
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0028
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.76
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N
PhyloP100
-0.64
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.18
N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.39
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.50
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.019
MVP
0.40
MPC
0.49
ClinPred
0.0023
T
GERP RS
-8.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.013
gMVP
0.072
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115031369; hg19: chr22-36678782; COSMIC: COSV99340280; COSMIC: COSV99340280; API