22-39511970-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_019008.6(MIEF1):c.266C>T(p.Thr89Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00511 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 357 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019008.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIEF1 | NM_019008.6 | c.266C>T | p.Thr89Met | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000325301.7 | NP_061881.2 | |
MIEF1 | NM_001304564.2 | c.266C>T | p.Thr89Met | missense_variant | 4/7 | NP_001291493.1 | ||
MIEF1 | NR_130789.2 | n.753C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/6 | ||||
MIEF1 | NR_130790.2 | n.903C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/7 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0260 AC: 3959AN: 152210Hom.: 182 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00705 AC: 1772AN: 251274Hom.: 84 AF XY: 0.00500 AC XY: 679AN XY: 135824
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00293 AC: 4290AN: 1461798Hom.: 174 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 1873AN XY: 727200
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0260 AC: 3964AN: 152328Hom.: 183 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0255 AC XY: 1898AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at