22-42649452-G-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000692152.1(CYB5R3):c.-48-12606C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.134 in 156,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,887 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1829 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 58 hom. )
Consequence
CYB5R3
ENST00000692152.1 intron
ENST00000692152.1 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.07
Publications
3 publications found
Genes affected
CYB5R3 (HGNC:2873): (cytochrome b5 reductase 3) This gene encodes cytochrome b5 reductase, which includes a membrane-bound form in somatic cells (anchored in the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrial and other membranes) and a soluble form in erythrocytes. The membrane-bound form exists mainly on the cytoplasmic side of the endoplasmic reticulum and functions in desaturation and elongation of fatty acids, in cholesterol biosynthesis, and in drug metabolism. The erythrocyte form is located in a soluble fraction of circulating erythrocytes and is involved in methemoglobin reduction. The membrane-bound form has both membrane-binding and catalytic domains, while the soluble form has only the catalytic domain. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene cause methemoglobinemias. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
CYB5R3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- methemoglobinemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Illumina
- methemoglobinemia due to deficiency of methemoglobin reductaseInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary methemoglobinemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 22-42649452-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-42649452-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1231332.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.5 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYB5R3 | NM_000398.7 | c.-137C>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENST00000352397.10 | NP_000389.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYB5R3 | ENST00000352397.10 | c.-137C>A | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | NM_000398.7 | ENSP00000338461.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.135 AC: 20215AN: 149654Hom.: 1824 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20215
AN:
149654
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.108 AC: 749AN: 6966Hom.: 58 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.108 AC XY: 380AN XY: 3526 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
749
AN:
6966
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
380
AN XY:
3526
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
116
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
50
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
48
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
58
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
580
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
62
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
12
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
531
AN:
5818
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
222
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.535
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.135 AC: 20244AN: 149762Hom.: 1829 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.140 AC XY: 10238AN XY: 73036 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20244
AN:
149762
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10238
AN XY:
73036
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
5923
AN:
41262
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1660
AN:
15092
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
277
AN:
3412
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2612
AN:
5062
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1057
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1509
AN:
10082
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
37
AN:
290
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
6785
AN:
66748
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
296
AN:
2078
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
814
1629
2443
3258
4072
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
232
464
696
928
1160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1073
AN:
3400
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided
Jun 18, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.