22-50744827-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001097.3(ACR):c.886A>G(p.Met296Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.683 in 1,600,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 374,742 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M296I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001097.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACR | NM_001097.3 | c.886A>G | p.Met296Val | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 5 | ENST00000216139.10 | NP_001088.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.680 AC: 100960AN: 148446Hom.: 34452 Cov.: 22 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.712 AC: 136773AN: 192086 AF XY: 0.715 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.683 AC: 991752AN: 1451922Hom.: 340262 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.687 AC XY: 495550AN XY: 721412 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.680 AC: 101030AN: 148558Hom.: 34480 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.683 AC XY: 49361AN XY: 72304 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 73% of total chromosomes in ExAC
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at