3-101693134-C-A
Variant names: 
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The ENST00000715156.1(ENSG00000293268):c.343C>A(p.Gln115Lys) variant causes a missense change. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
 Genomes: 𝑓 0.25   (  0   hom.,  cov: 50) 
 Failed GnomAD Quality Control 
Consequence
 ENSG00000293268
ENST00000715156.1 missense
ENST00000715156.1 missense
Scores
 2
Clinical Significance
 Not reported in ClinVar 
Conservation
 No conservation score assigned 
Publications
1 publications found 
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.96). 
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOC124906262 | XM_047449411.1 | c.343C>A | p.Gln115Lys | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | XP_047305367.1 | ||
| LOC124906262 | XM_047449412.1 | c.343C>A | p.Gln115Lys | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | XP_047305368.1 | ||
| LOC124906262 | XM_047449413.1 | c.343C>A | p.Gln115Lys | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | XP_047305369.1 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000293268 | ENST00000715156.1 | c.343C>A | p.Gln115Lys | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000520357.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000293268 | ENST00000715157.1 | c.130C>A | p.Gln44Lys | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000520358.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000293268 | ENST00000667844.1 | n.730+165C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 | ||||||
| ENSG00000293268 | ENST00000685383.1 | n.697+165C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.254  AC: 28059AN: 110460Hom.:  0  Cov.: 50 show subpopulations 
GnomAD3 genomes 
 AF: 
AC: 
28059
AN: 
110460
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
50
Gnomad AFR 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMI 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMR 
 AF: 
Gnomad ASJ 
 AF: 
Gnomad EAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad SAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad FIN 
 AF: 
Gnomad MID 
 AF: 
Gnomad NFE 
 AF: 
Gnomad OTH 
 AF: 
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome  0.254  AC: 28112AN: 110556Hom.:  0  Cov.: 50 AF XY:  0.256  AC XY: 13898AN XY: 54296 show subpopulations  ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. 
GnomAD4 genome 
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: InbreedingCoeff
 AF: 
AC: 
28112
AN: 
110556
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
50
 AF XY: 
AC XY: 
13898
AN XY: 
54296
show subpopulations 
 ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. 
African (AFR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
13372
AN: 
32606
American (AMR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
2354
AN: 
10770
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) 
 AF: 
AC: 
418
AN: 
2370
East Asian (EAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
919
AN: 
3604
South Asian (SAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
875
AN: 
3386
European-Finnish (FIN) 
 AF: 
AC: 
1641
AN: 
7618
Middle Eastern (MID) 
 AF: 
AC: 
35
AN: 
188
European-Non Finnish (NFE) 
 AF: 
AC: 
7999
AN: 
47908
Other (OTH) 
 AF: 
AC: 
381
AN: 
1502
 ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals. 
 Allele Balance Distribution 
 Red line indicates average allele balance 
 Average allele balance: 0.312 
Heterozygous variant carriers
 0 
 1867 
 3734 
 5601 
 7468 
 9335 
 0.00 
 0.20 
 0.40 
 0.60 
 0.80 
 0.95 
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
 0 
 330 
 660 
 990 
 1320 
 1650 
 <30 
 30-35 
 35-40 
 40-45 
 45-50 
 50-55 
 55-60 
 60-65 
 65-70 
 70-75 
 75-80 
 >80 
Age
Alfa 
 AF: 
Hom.: 
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
 BayesDel_noAF 
 Benign 
 DANN 
 Benign 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at 
Publications
 You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.