3-120167610-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_153002.3(GPR156):c.1867C>T(p.Arg623Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000498 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R623Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153002.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_153002.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPR156 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1867C>T | p.Arg623Trp | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000417261.1 | Q8NFN8-1 | ||
| GPR156 | TSL:1 | c.1855C>T | p.Arg619Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000418758.1 | Q8NFN8-2 | ||
| GPR156 | c.1867C>T | p.Arg623Trp | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000602387.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000440 AC: 67AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000323 AC: 81AN: 250972 AF XY: 0.000339 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000504 AC: 737AN: 1461744Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000485 AC XY: 353AN XY: 727164 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000440 AC: 67AN: 152350Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000389 AC XY: 29AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at