3-120331228-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_001099678.2(LRRC58):c.1088G>A(p.Arg363His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000737 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R363C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099678.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001099678.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRRC58 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1088G>A | p.Arg363His | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000295628.3 | Q96CX6 | ||
| LRRC58 | c.1085G>A | p.Arg362His | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000616212.1 | ||||
| LRRC58 | c.959G>A | p.Arg320His | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000556100.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000682 AC: 17AN: 249242 AF XY: 0.0000666 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000773 AC: 113AN: 1461648Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000894 AC XY: 65AN XY: 727106 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at