3-124744016-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_000373.4(UMPS):c.1375C>T(p.Arg459Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000167 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R459G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000373.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- orotic aciduriaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMPS | NM_000373.4 | c.1375C>T | p.Arg459Cys | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | ENST00000232607.7 | NP_000364.1 | |
| UMPS | NR_033434.2 | n.1241C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 5 of 5 | ||||
| UMPS | NR_033437.2 | n.1494C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 7 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251482 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at