3-12663990-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BA1BP7

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.-204G>C variant in RAF1 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.15126% (95% CI of 32/15402) of non-Finnish European chromosomes in gnomAD (BA1; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant is not located within the splice consensus sequence and computational splice site prediction tools do not predict an impact on splicing (BP4, BP7). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BP4, BP7. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA180843/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RAF1
NM_002880.4 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.43

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAF1 (HGNC:9829): (Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene is the cellular homolog of viral raf gene (v-raf). The encoded protein is a MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAP3K), which functions downstream of the Ras family of membrane associated GTPases to which it binds directly. Once activated, the cellular RAF1 protein can phosphorylate to activate the dual specificity protein kinases MEK1 and MEK2, which in turn phosphorylate to activate the serine/threonine specific protein kinases, ERK1 and ERK2. Activated ERKs are pleiotropic effectors of cell physiology and play an important role in the control of gene expression involved in the cell division cycle, apoptosis, cell differentiation and cell migration. Mutations in this gene are associated with Noonan syndrome 5 and LEOPARD syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RAF1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Noonan syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, G2P
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1NN
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • LEOPARD syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Costello syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP7
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RAF1NM_002880.4 linkc.-204G>C 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 1 of 17 ENST00000251849.9 NP_002871.1
RAF1NM_002880.4 linkc.-204G>C 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 17 ENST00000251849.9 NP_002871.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAF1ENST00000251849.9 linkc.-204G>C 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 1 of 17 1 NM_002880.4 ENSP00000251849.4
RAF1ENST00000251849.9 linkc.-204G>C 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 17 1 NM_002880.4 ENSP00000251849.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152204
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000941
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00238
AC:
586
AN:
246260
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00254
AC XY:
317
AN XY:
124834
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000557
AC:
4
AN:
7176
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00188
AC:
14
AN:
7434
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9230
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
22894
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3034
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000336
AC:
7
AN:
20824
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1296
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00325
AC:
514
AN:
158006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00287
AC:
47
AN:
16366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
41
83
124
166
207
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152322
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00138
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000938
AC:
39
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
19
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00316
AC:
215
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
28
43
57
71
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000425
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00189

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
May 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RAF1: BS1 -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

LEOPARD syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Noonan syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 25, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

-204G>C in the 5'UTR of RAF1: This variant has been identified in our laboratory in four probands with clinical features of Noonan spectrum disorders. However, this variant was also identified in a parent of three of these individuals who r eportedly do not have clinical features associated with Noonan spectrum disorder s. Furthermore, this variant is located in the 5'UTR and although variants in re gulatory regions could have an effect on transcriptional or translational effici ency, variants of this type have not been reported in Noonan spectrum disorders to date. Therefore, this variant is likely to be benign. -

LEOPARD syndrome 2;C1969057:Noonan syndrome 5;C4014656:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1NN Benign:1
Nov 11, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

RASopathy Benign:1
Nov 04, 2019
ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The c.-204G>C variant in RAF1 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.15126% (95% CI of 32/15402) of non-Finnish European chromosomes in gnomAD (BA1; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant is not located within the splice consensus sequence and computational splice site prediction tools do not predict an impact on splicing (BP4, BP7). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BP4, BP7. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
1.4
PromoterAI
0.049
Neutral

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs547543588; hg19: chr3-12705489; API