3-128926196-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001394090.1(CFAP92):c.2751+6504C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.432 in 152,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,718 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001394090.1 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001394090.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFAP92 | NM_001394090.1 | MANE Select | c.2751+6504C>G | intron | N/A | NP_001381019.1 | |||
| CFAP92 | NM_001348520.2 | c.1878+6504C>G | intron | N/A | NP_001335449.1 | ||||
| CFAP92 | NM_001348521.2 | c.1782+6504C>G | intron | N/A | NP_001335450.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFAP92 | ENST00000645291.3 | MANE Select | c.2751+6504C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000496592.2 | |||
| CFAP92 | ENST00000511438.5 | TSL:2 | c.1169-15863C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000426217.1 | |||
| CFAP92 | ENST00000669741.1 | c.561+6504C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000499631.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.432 AC: 65687AN: 152012Hom.: 16685 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.432 AC: 65773AN: 152132Hom.: 16718 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.429 AC XY: 31865AN XY: 74348 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at