3-129530994-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000539.3(RHO):c.480C>A(p.Thr160=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00235 in 1,614,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
RHO
NM_000539.3 synonymous
NM_000539.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.714
Genes affected
RHO (HGNC:10012): (rhodopsin) The protein encoded by this gene is found in rod cells in the back of the eye and is essential for vision in low-light conditions. The encoded protein binds to 11-cis retinal and is activated when light hits the retinal molecule. Defects in this gene are a cause of congenital stationary night blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).
BP6
Variant 3-129530994-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-129530994-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 343277.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr3-129530994-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr3-129530994-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.714 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00166 (253/152370) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00266 (181/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00234. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 117 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHO | NM_000539.3 | c.480C>A | p.Thr160= | synonymous_variant | 2/5 | ENST00000296271.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHO | ENST00000296271.4 | c.480C>A | p.Thr160= | synonymous_variant | 2/5 | 1 | NM_000539.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00166 AC: 253AN: 152252Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
253
AN:
152252
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00152 AC: 383AN: 251452Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00151 AC XY: 205AN XY: 135908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
383
AN:
251452
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
205
AN XY:
135908
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00242 AC: 3538AN: 1461874Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00238 AC XY: 1734AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3538
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1734
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00166 AC: 253AN: 152370Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00157 AC XY: 117AN XY: 74518
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
253
AN:
152370
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
74518
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | RHO: BP4, BP7 - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Congenital stationary night blindness autosomal dominant 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at