3-132697362-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):​c.1986G>A​(p.Arg662Arg) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,593,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 85 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 48 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP3
NM_153240.5 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

1
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.7586
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.70

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).
BP6
Variant 3-132697362-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132697362-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 96510.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.7 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0139 (2109/152214) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0482 (2002/41508). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0465. There are 48 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 972 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 48 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP3NM_153240.5 linkc.1986G>A p.Arg662Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 27 ENST00000337331.10 NP_694972.3 Q7Z494-1
NPHP3-ACAD11NR_037804.1 linkn.1992G>A splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 45

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP3ENST00000337331.10 linkc.1986G>A p.Arg662Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 27 1 NM_153240.5 ENSP00000338766.5 Q7Z494-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0138
AC:
2104
AN:
152096
Hom.:
47
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00336
AC:
835
AN:
248506
AF XY:
0.00236
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0458
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000887
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00128
AC:
1842
AN:
1441232
Hom.:
37
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
773
AN XY:
718470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0463
AC:
1530
AN:
33022
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00264
AC:
118
AN:
44662
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25982
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39494
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000233
AC:
2
AN:
85670
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51278
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000900
AC:
5
AN:
5558
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
36
AN:
1095820
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00253
AC:
151
AN:
59746
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
80
160
239
319
399
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
50
100
150
200
250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0139
AC:
2109
AN:
152214
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0131
AC XY:
972
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0482
AC:
2002
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
75
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
9
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
23
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
104
208
313
417
521
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00431
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0150
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00174
AC:
6
AN:
3466
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Oct 08, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 28, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
PhyloP100
2.7
Mutation Taster
=31/69
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.76
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.67
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77533254; hg19: chr3-132416206; API