3-132722299-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):​c.57G>C​(p.Thr19Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0174 in 1,580,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 311 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T19T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 20 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 291 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP3
NM_153240.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0270

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-AS1 (HGNC:24129): (NPHP3 antisense RNA 1)
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 3-132722299-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132722299-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 167369.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.027 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0138 (2105/152090) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0202 (1374/67966). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0193. There are 20 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 978 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 20 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_153240.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
NPHP3
NM_153240.5
MANE Select
c.57G>Cp.Thr19Thr
synonymous
Exon 1 of 27NP_694972.3
NPHP3-AS1
NR_002811.2
n.550C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 11
NPHP3-ACAD11
NR_037804.1
n.161G>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 45

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
NPHP3
ENST00000337331.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.57G>Cp.Thr19Thr
synonymous
Exon 1 of 27ENSP00000338766.5
NPHP3
ENST00000383282.3
TSL:1
c.57G>Cp.Thr19Thr
synonymous
Exon 1 of 2ENSP00000372769.2
NPHP3-AS1
ENST00000489343.5
TSL:1
n.550C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0139
AC:
2108
AN:
151982
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00403
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00877
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00973
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0382
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0158
AC:
3306
AN:
209862
AF XY:
0.0161
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0211
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0178
AC:
25370
AN:
1428852
Hom.:
291
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0177
AC XY:
12602
AN XY:
711228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00235
AC:
73
AN:
31072
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0142
AC:
613
AN:
43036
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0253
AC:
647
AN:
25558
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
37612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
958
AN:
84224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
510
AN:
38338
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0197
AC:
99
AN:
5024
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0194
AC:
21446
AN:
1104548
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
1024
AN:
59440
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1515
3029
4544
6058
7573
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
782
1564
2346
3128
3910
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0138
AC:
2105
AN:
152090
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0132
AC XY:
978
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00402
AC:
167
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0143
AC:
218
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0259
AC:
90
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000194
AC:
1
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00953
AC:
46
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0147
AC:
155
AN:
10564
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0308
AC:
9
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0202
AC:
1374
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
37
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
106
212
319
425
531
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0118
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.0139
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00551
AC:
19
AN:
3460

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Mar 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Feb 18, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Kidney disorder Benign:1
Jan 01, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-0.027
PromoterAI
-0.15
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192633696; hg19: chr3-132441143; API