3-146121108-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_182943.3(PLOD2):​c.338+4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.767 in 1,585,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 467,888 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.78 ( 46019 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.77 ( 421869 hom. )

Consequence

PLOD2
NM_182943.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00004899
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.509

Publications

13 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PLOD2 (HGNC:9082): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane-bound homodimeric enzyme that is localized to the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIB have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Mutations in the coding region of this gene are associated with Bruck syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PLOD2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bruck syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Bruck syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 3-146121108-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-146121108-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 263074.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.812 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PLOD2NM_182943.3 linkc.338+4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 19 ENST00000282903.10 NP_891988.1 O00469-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PLOD2ENST00000282903.10 linkc.338+4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 19 1 NM_182943.3 ENSP00000282903.5 O00469-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.777
AC:
118090
AN:
151902
Hom.:
45978
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.815
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.730
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.744
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.840
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.833
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.729
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.707
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.801
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.769
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.782
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.765
AC:
191652
AN:
250686
AF XY:
0.763
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.813
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.725
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.842
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.846
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.710
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.769
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.772
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.766
AC:
1098486
AN:
1433798
Hom.:
421869
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.765
AC XY:
547281
AN XY:
715498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.819
AC:
26966
AN:
32910
American (AMR)
AF:
0.728
AC:
32490
AN:
44636
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.847
AC:
21994
AN:
25970
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.805
AC:
31802
AN:
39530
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.731
AC:
62651
AN:
85704
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.704
AC:
37434
AN:
53154
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.800
AC:
4580
AN:
5728
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.768
AC:
834323
AN:
1086692
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.778
AC:
46246
AN:
59474
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11061
22121
33182
44242
55303
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19864
39728
59592
79456
99320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.777
AC:
118189
AN:
152020
Hom.:
46019
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.773
AC XY:
57413
AN XY:
74270
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.815
AC:
33816
AN:
41482
American (AMR)
AF:
0.743
AC:
11337
AN:
15256
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.840
AC:
2915
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.833
AC:
4305
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.728
AC:
3493
AN:
4796
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.707
AC:
7458
AN:
10550
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.803
AC:
236
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.769
AC:
52308
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.785
AC:
1658
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1328
2657
3985
5314
6642
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
866
1732
2598
3464
4330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.777
Hom.:
200623
Bravo
AF:
0.783
Asia WGS
AF:
0.801
AC:
2786
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.776
EpiControl
AF:
0.774

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jun 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 22, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bruck syndrome 2 Benign:3
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 25, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.38
PhyloP100
0.51
Mutation Taster
=76/24
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000049
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.018
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4681297; hg19: chr3-145838895; API