3-15644341-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001370658.1(BTD):c.425C>T(p.Ala142Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A142P) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370658.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- biotinidase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTD | NM_001370658.1 | c.425C>T | p.Ala142Val | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000643237.3 | NP_001357587.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251188 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461836Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727216 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74204 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Biotinidase deficiency Pathogenic:4Uncertain:1
- -
This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 162 of the BTD protein (p.Ala162Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs397514364, gnomAD 0.0009%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with BTD-related conditions (PMID: 25144890, 27657684). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 25014). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BTD protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
- -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
The BTD c.485C>T; p.Ala162Val variant (rs397514364) is reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with partial to profound biotinidase deficiency usually found with a second pathogenic variant (Norrgard 1999, Wolf 2017). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 25014) and is only observed on one allele in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The alanine at codon 162 is highly conserved, and computational analyses predict that this variant is deleterious (REVEL: 0.928). Based on available information, this variant is considered to be pathogenic. References: Norrgard KJ et al. Mutations causing profound biotinidase deficiency in children ascertained by newborn screening in the United States occur at different frequencies than in symptomatic children. Pediatr Res. 1999 Jul;46(1):20-7. PMID: 10400129. Wolf B et al. Successful outcomes of older adolescents and adults with profound biotinidase deficiency identified by newborn screening. Genet Med. 2017 Apr;19(4):396-402. PMID: 27657684. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at