3-15644736-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 3P and 17B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_001370658.1(BTD):​c.820A>G​(p.Ile274Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 1,614,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 74 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 40 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 34 hom. )

Consequence

BTD
NM_001370658.1 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0220

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BTD (HGNC:1122): (biotinidase) The protein encoded by this gene functions to recycle protein-bound biotin by cleaving biocytin (biotin-epsilon-lysine), a normal product of carboxylase degradation, resulting in regeneration of free biotin. The encoded protein has also been shown to have biotinyl transferase activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with biotinidase deficiency. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2013]
BTD Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • biotinidase deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 7 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 7 uncertain in NM_001370658.1
PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 88 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 9 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: -0.52516 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 0.15371 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to Leigh syndrome, biotinidase deficiency.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006632507).
BP6
Variant 3-15644736-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-15644736-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 25047.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0109 (1663/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0384 (1594/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0368. There are 40 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 794 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 40 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BTDNM_001370658.1 linkc.820A>G p.Ile274Val missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000643237.3 NP_001357587.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BTDENST00000643237.3 linkc.820A>G p.Ile274Val missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 NM_001370658.1 ENSP00000495254.2 P43251-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0109
AC:
1654
AN:
152178
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0383
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00360
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00527
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00324
AC:
814
AN:
251404
AF XY:
0.00230
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0423
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00123
AC:
1796
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00105
AC XY:
767
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0422
AC:
1412
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
143
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
18
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00295
AC:
17
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
56
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
150
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
128
256
385
513
641
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0109
AC:
1663
AN:
152296
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0107
AC XY:
794
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0384
AC:
1594
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00359
AC:
55
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00521
AC:
11
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
81
162
243
324
405
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00470
Hom.:
29
Bravo
AF:
0.0129
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0395
AC:
174
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00396
AC:
481
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Biotinidase deficiency Benign:7
Apr 04, 2024
Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 06, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

not provided Benign:4
Jun 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BTD: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Sep 28, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

BTD-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 20, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not specified Benign:1
May 17, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BTD c.820A>G (p.Ile274Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0032 in 251404 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.042 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 9.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BTD causing Biotinidase Deficiency phenotype (0.0046), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
0.018
DANN
Benign
0.21
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
.;.;T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.9
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0063
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
.;T;T;.;.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0066
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.1
.;.;N;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
-0.022
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.64
.;N;.;.;.;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Benign
1.0
.;T;.;.;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
.;T;.;.;.;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.049, 0.030, 0.032
MVP
0.50
MPC
0.061
ClinPred
0.0019
T
GERP RS
-4.3
Varity_R
0.016
gMVP
0.67
Mutation Taster
=83/17
disease causing (ClinVar)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35976361; hg19: chr3-15686243; COSMIC: COSV99068531; COSMIC: COSV99068531; API