3-160307663-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_020800.3(IFT80):​c.1076C>T​(p.Ser359Phe) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00809 in 1,445,354 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 99 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0081 ( 90 hom. )

Consequence

IFT80
NM_020800.3 missense, splice_region

Scores

5
10
3
Splicing: ADA: 0.9923
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.50

Publications

17 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
IFT80 (HGNC:29262): (intraflagellar transport 80) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the intraflagellar transport complex B and is necessary for the function of motile and sensory cilia. Defects in this gene are a cause of asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 2 (ATD2). Three transcript variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
TRIM59-IFT80 (HGNC:56756): (TRIM59-IFT80 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring readthrough transcription between the neighboring TRIM59 (tripartite motif containing 59) and IFT80 (intraflagellar transport 80) genes on chromosome 3. The readthrough transcript is unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing predictors support a deleterious effect. Scorers claiming Pathogenic: dbscSNV1_ADA, dbscSNV1_RF. No scorers claiming Uncertain. Scorers claiming Benign: max_spliceai.
BP6
Variant 3-160307663-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-160307663-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 193733.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00764 (1163/152250) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0243 (372/15280). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0223. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 569 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
IFT80NM_020800.3 linkc.1076C>T p.Ser359Phe missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 10 of 20 ENST00000326448.12 NP_065851.1 Q9P2H3-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
IFT80ENST00000326448.12 linkc.1076C>T p.Ser359Phe missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 10 of 20 1 NM_020800.3 ENSP00000312778.7 Q9P2H3-1
TRIM59-IFT80ENST00000483754.1 linkn.1589C>T splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 8 of 19 2 ENSP00000456272.1 H3BRJ5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00762
AC:
1159
AN:
152132
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00381
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00737
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00671
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0108
AC:
2703
AN:
250732
AF XY:
0.00914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0436
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00505
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00709
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00914
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00814
AC:
10527
AN:
1293104
Hom.:
90
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.00770
AC XY:
5024
AN XY:
652494
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00272
AC:
82
AN:
30108
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0424
AC:
1887
AN:
44504
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000159
AC:
4
AN:
25186
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
48
AN:
38902
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00440
AC:
364
AN:
82820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00551
AC:
291
AN:
52860
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000975
AC:
5
AN:
5130
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00772
AC:
7399
AN:
958556
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00812
AC:
447
AN:
55038
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
461
923
1384
1846
2307
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
290
580
870
1160
1450
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00764
AC:
1163
AN:
152250
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00764
AC XY:
569
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
157
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0243
AC:
372
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000773
AC:
4
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00435
AC:
21
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00481
AC:
51
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00737
AC:
501
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00664
AC:
14
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
59
117
176
234
293
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00731
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.00929
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00701
AC:
26
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00649
AC:
25
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00272
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00767
AC:
66
ExAC
AF:
0.00964
AC:
1170
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00720
EpiControl
AF:
0.00610

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 22, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 14, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jul 21, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Feb 04, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.53
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Pathogenic
34
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.59
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.73
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.67
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;.;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0087
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.029
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;.;.;.
PhyloP100
4.5
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.76
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.0
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.45
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.
Vest4
0.73
MPC
0.65
ClinPred
0.040
T
GERP RS
5.1
PromoterAI
-0.0072
Neutral
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.68
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
0.99
dbscSNV1_RF
Pathogenic
0.75
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144099135; hg19: chr3-160025451; API