3-180659682-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):​c.604G>A​(p.Ala202Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00191 in 1,608,360 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A202A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 28 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC39
NM_181426.2 missense

Scores

7
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.15
Variant links:
Genes affected
CCDC39 (HGNC:25244): (coiled-coil domain 39 molecular ruler complex subunit) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the motility of cilia and flagella. The encoded protein is essential for the assembly of dynein regulatory and inner dynein arm complexes, which regulate ciliary beat. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 14 (CILD14). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008814514).
BP6
Variant 3-180659682-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-180659682-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 262974.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0101 (1533/152218) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0346 (1438/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0331. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 682 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CCDC39NM_181426.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.604G>A p.Ala202Thr missense_variant 5/20 ENST00000476379.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CCDC39ENST00000476379.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.604G>A p.Ala202Thr missense_variant 5/202 NM_181426.2 P2Q9UFE4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1529
AN:
152100
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0347
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00413
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00911
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
614
AN:
244108
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
221
AN XY:
132342
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000344
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000987
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000847
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
1540
AN:
1456142
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000889
AC XY:
644
AN XY:
724196
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00248
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1533
AN:
152218
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00916
AC XY:
682
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00426
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00901
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.0122
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0390
AC:
142
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000368
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00309
AC:
373
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Ala202Thr in exon 5 of CCDC39: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 3.9% (142/3638) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61733578). -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 27, 2020This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 06, 2021- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.019
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.52
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.51
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0088
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.84
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.4
N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Uncertain
0.0090
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.070
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61733578; hg19: chr3-180377470; COSMIC: COSV56495159; COSMIC: COSV56495159; API