3-190388114-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001378492.1(CLDN16):c.-93-123C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000626 in 1,613,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000053 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CLDN16
NM_001378492.1 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLDN16 (HGNC:2037): (claudin 16) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. It is found primarily in the kidneys, specifically in the thick ascending limb of Henle, where it acts as either an intercellular pore or ion concentration sensor to regulate the paracellular resorption of magnesium ions. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary hypomagnesemia, which is characterized by massive renal magnesium wasting with hypomagnesemia and hypercalciuria, resulting in nephrocalcinosis and renal failure. This gene and the CLDN1 gene are clustered on chromosome 3q28. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

CLDN16 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152224) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00445 (23/5164). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00304. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 14 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	MANE
CLDN16	NM_001378492.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-93-123C>T	intron_variant
CLDN16	NM_001378493.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-93-123C>T	intron_variant
CLDN16	XM_047447333.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-93-123C>T	intron_variant
CLDN16	NM_006580.4 linkuse as main transcript		upstream_gene_variant	ENST00000264734.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	TSL	MANE	Appris
CLDN16	ENST00000468220.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.306+13511C>T	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant	4
CLDN16	ENST00000264734.3 linkuse as main transcript		upstream_gene_variant	1	NM_006580.4	P1
CLDN16	ENST00000456423.2 linkuse as main transcript		upstream_gene_variant	1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

152106

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00444

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000252

AC:

AN:

250290

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000237

AC XY:

AN XY:

135282

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00339

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000534

AC:

AN:

1461336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000550

AC XY:

AN XY:

726982

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74414

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00445

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary hypomagnesemia

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

Cadd

Benign

0.75

Dann

Benign

0.78

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over