3-190388117-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001378492.1(CLDN16):c.-93-120A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000429 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
CLDN16
NM_001378492.1 intron
NM_001378492.1 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.83
Genes affected
CLDN16 (HGNC:2037): (claudin 16) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. It is found primarily in the kidneys, specifically in the thick ascending limb of Henle, where it acts as either an intercellular pore or ion concentration sensor to regulate the paracellular resorption of magnesium ions. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary hypomagnesemia, which is characterized by massive renal magnesium wasting with hypomagnesemia and hypercalciuria, resulting in nephrocalcinosis and renal failure. This gene and the CLDN1 gene are clustered on chromosome 3q28. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00212 (323/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00756 (314/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00687. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 159 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDN16 | NM_001378492.1 | c.-93-120A>T | intron_variant | NP_001365421.1 | ||||
CLDN16 | NM_001378493.1 | c.-93-120A>T | intron_variant | NP_001365422.1 | ||||
CLDN16 | XM_047447333.1 | c.-93-120A>T | intron_variant | XP_047303289.1 | ||||
CLDN16 | NM_006580.4 | upstream_gene_variant | ENST00000264734.3 | NP_006571.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDN16 | ENST00000468220.1 | n.306+13514A>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 | ||||||
CLDN16 | ENST00000264734.3 | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | NM_006580.4 | ENSP00000264734 | P1 | ||||
CLDN16 | ENST00000456423.2 | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | ENSP00000414136 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00213 AC: 324AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
324
AN:
152072
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000523 AC: 131AN: 250532Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000347 AC XY: 47AN XY: 135418
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
131
AN:
250532
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
135418
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000252 AC: 369AN: 1461556Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000231 AC XY: 168AN XY: 727078
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
369
AN:
1461556
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
168
AN XY:
727078
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00212 AC: 323AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00214 AC XY: 159AN XY: 74408
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
323
AN:
152190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
159
AN XY:
74408
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Primary hypomagnesemia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 23, 2022 | Nucleotide substitution has no predicted effect on splicing and is not conserved across species; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
CLDN16-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 27, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at