3-25428771-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000965.5(RARB):c.40C>G(p.Gln14Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000167 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000965.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- microphthalmia, syndromic 12Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Baylor College of Medicine Research Center, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Matthew-Wood syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000965.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RARB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.40C>G | p.Gln14Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000332296.4 | P10826-2 | ||
| RARB | TSL:1 | c.-180+240C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000398840.2 | P10826-3 | |||
| RARB | c.40C>G | p.Gln14Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000578095.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251138 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000178 AC: 26AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74428 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at