3-31533023-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_178862.3(STT3B):c.25A>G(p.Ser9Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000139 in 1,436,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S9R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178862.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- STT3B-congenital disorder of glycosylationInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_178862.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STT3B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.25A>G | p.Ser9Gly | missense | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000295770.2 | Q8TCJ2 | ||
| STT3B | TSL:1 | n.386A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 10 | |||||
| STT3B | c.25A>G | p.Ser9Gly | missense | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000605292.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000139 AC: 2AN: 1436936Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000280 AC XY: 2AN XY: 714842 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at