3-33130011-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_006371.5(CRTAP):c.866C>T(p.Pro289Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000297 in 1,613,246 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P289P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006371.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- osteogenesis imperfecta type 7Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- osteogenesis imperfecta type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- osteogenesis imperfecta type 3Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- osteogenesis imperfecta type 4Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006371.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTAP | NM_006371.5 | MANE Select | c.866C>T | p.Pro289Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | NP_006362.1 | ||
| CRTAP | NM_001393363.1 | c.866C>T | p.Pro289Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 6 | NP_001380292.1 | |||
| CRTAP | NM_001393365.1 | c.716C>T | p.Pro239Leu | missense | Exon 3 of 6 | NP_001380294.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTAP | ENST00000320954.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.866C>T | p.Pro289Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | ENSP00000323696.5 | ||
| CRTAP | ENST00000485310.1 | TSL:4 | n.460C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 5 | ||||
| CRTAP | ENST00000449224.1 | TSL:2 | c.794-2544C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000409997.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000111 AC: 28AN: 251476 AF XY: 0.000110 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000311 AC: 455AN: 1461140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000281 AC XY: 204AN XY: 726968 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Osteogenesis imperfecta type 7 Uncertain:1Other:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 289 of the CRTAP protein (p.Pro289Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs147140948, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CRTAP-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 534205). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Variant interpretted as Uncertain significance and reported on 08-03-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant.
Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-07-2020 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information.
not provided Uncertain:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at