3-33146339-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006371.5(CRTAP):c.*3891C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.231 in 152,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,054 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 5051 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
CRTAP
NM_006371.5 3_prime_UTR
NM_006371.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0330
Genes affected
CRTAP (HGNC:2379): (cartilage associated protein) The protein encoded by this gene is similar to the chicken and mouse CRTAP genes. The encoded protein is a scaffolding protein that may influence the activity of at least one member of the cytohesin/ARNO family in response to specific cellular stimuli. Defects in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta, a connective tissue disorder characterized by bone fragility and low bone mass. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 3-33146339-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-33146339-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 344875.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.521 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAP | NM_006371.5 | c.*3891C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000320954.11 | NP_006362.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAP | ENST00000320954.11 | c.*3891C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/7 | 1 | NM_006371.5 | ENSP00000323696 | P1 | ||
ENST00000607832.1 | n.166+1217G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.232 AC: 35201AN: 152034Hom.: 5056 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
35201
AN:
152034
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.210 AC: 29AN: 138Hom.: 3 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.192 AC XY: 20AN XY: 104
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
138
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
104
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.232 AC: 35225AN: 152152Hom.: 5051 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.244 AC XY: 18167AN XY: 74374
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
35225
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
18167
AN XY:
74374
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at