3-36993638-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PP3_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.91G>T​(p.Ala31Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000551 in 1,614,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A31C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

12
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.49

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
MLH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Lynch syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 26 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 51 uncertain in NM_000249.4
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.935
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000561 (82/1461864) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00173 (10/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00094. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 50 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000249.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MLH1
NM_000249.4
MANE Select
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 19NP_000240.1
MLH1
NM_001354628.2
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 18NP_001341557.1
MLH1
NM_001354629.2
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 18NP_001341558.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MLH1
ENST00000231790.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 19ENSP00000231790.3
MLH1
ENST00000456676.7
TSL:1
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 17ENSP00000416687.3
MLH1
ENST00000413740.2
TSL:1
c.91G>Tp.Ala31Ser
missense
Exon 1 of 15ENSP00000416476.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000836
AC:
21
AN:
251118
AF XY:
0.0000957
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000561
AC:
82
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000688
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000179
AC:
6
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000232
AC:
20
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
10
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000315
AC:
35
AN:
1112000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000166
AC:
10
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
13
19
26
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000459
AC:
7
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000268
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000240
AC:
1
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000653
AC:
1
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000945
AC:
2
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.000107
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000529
ExAC
AF:
0.000107
AC:
13
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:2
Mar 26, 2024
Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Jul 29, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces alanine with serine at codon 31 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MLH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 22/282520 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

not provided Uncertain:1
Mar 31, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MLH1 c.91_92delinsTG; p.Ala31Cys variant (rs63749994) is reported in the medical literature in several individuals with Lynch syndrome (Auclair 2006, Drost 2010, Hardt 2011), some of whom also carried the MLH1 c.1360G>C; p.Gly454Arg variant of uncertain significance (Auclair 2006, Hardt 2011). The c.91_92delGCinsTG variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 90442), and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.0078% (22/282508 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The alanine at position 31 is highly conserved and computational algorithms (PolyPhen2, SIFT) predict a deleterious effect. This variant has reduced in vitro mismatch repair activity when compared to wild type, but still maintains significantly higher activity than known deleterious variants (Drost 2010). However, given the limited clinical and functional data, the significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. References: Auclair et al. Systematic mRNA analysis for the effect of MLH1 and MSH2 missense and silent mutations on aberrant splicing. Hum Mutat. 2006 ;27(2):145-154. PMID: 16395668. Drost et al. A cell-free assay for the functional analysis of variants of the mismatch repair protein MLH1. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(3):247-253. PMID: 20020535. Hardt et al. Missense variants in hMLH1 identified in patients from the German HNPCC consortium and functional studies. Fam Cancer. 2011;10(2):273-284. PMID: 21404117.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Mar 13, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.A31S variant (also known as c.91G>T), located in coding exon 1 of the MLH1 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 91. The alanine at codon 31 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by MAPP-MMR in silico analyses (Chao EC et al. Hum. Mutat. 2008 Jun;29:852-60). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Sep 03, 2019
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.47
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.37
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.60
CADD
Pathogenic
32
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.90
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.74
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.64
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.94
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.42
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
4.3
H
PhyloP100
9.5
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.93
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.045
D
Polyphen
0.99
D
Vest4
0.75
MutPred
0.77
Loss of ubiquitination at K33 (P = 0.0795)
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.38
ClinPred
0.88
D
GERP RS
6.0
PromoterAI
-0.13
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.6
Varity_R
0.96
gMVP
0.64
Mutation Taster
=18/82
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs749671520; hg19: chr3-37035129; API