3-36993639-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 6P and 1B. PM1PM5PP3_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.92C>G(p.Ala31Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000551 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A31C) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.52

Variant links:

Genes affected

MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

MLH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.

PM1

In a helix (size 13) in uniprot entity MLH1_HUMAN there are 19 pathogenic changes around while only 8 benign (70%) in NM_000249.4

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chrnull-null-null-null is described in UniProt as null.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.919

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000561 (82/1461838) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00173 (10/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00094. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 50 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MLH1	NM_000249.4 link	c.92C>G	p.Ala31Gly	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 19	ENST00000231790.8	NP_000240.1	P40692-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MLH1	ENST00000231790.8 link	c.92C>G	p.Ala31Gly	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 19	1	NM_000249.4	ENSP00000231790.3		P40692-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000836

AC:

AN:

251108

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000957

AC XY:

AN XY:

135782

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000561

AC:

AN:

1461838

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000315

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000459

AC:

AN:

152348

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000268

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000158

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ExAC

AF:

0.000107

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2

Uncertain:2

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Mar 26, 2024

Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome

Uncertain:2

Jul 29, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces alanine with glycine at codon 31 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MLH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 22/282508 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Feb 18, 2015

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms

Uncertain:1

Dec 06, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 31 of the MLH1 protein (p.Ala31Gly). This variant is present in population databases (rs730882127, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MLH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 183068). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.52

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.37

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.60

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.94

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.76

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.76

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.72

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.92

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.71

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

4.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.91

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0090

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.71

MutPred

0.69

Loss of ubiquitination at K33 (P = 0.0997);

MVP

0.98

MPC

0.40

ClinPred

0.96

GERP RS

6.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Varity_R

0.97

gMVP

0.67

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.40

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DG_spliceai

0.40

Position offset: -1

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over