3-36993651-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.104T>G(p.Met35Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M35N) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Pathogenic:1
This variant is considered likely pathogenic. Functional studies indicate this variant impacts protein function [PMID: 17510385]. This variant has been reported in multiple individuals with clinical features of gene-specific disease [PMID: 8521398]. This variant is expected to disrupt protein structure [Myriad internal data]. -
Carcinoma of colon Pathogenic:1
The p.Met35Arg variant has not been previously identified in our laboratory, but has been reported in the literature in at least 4/245 probands (0.008 frequency) with HNPCC and was absent from 146 controls (Tannergard 1995, Halvarsson 2005, Poley 2007, Lagerstedt Robinson 2007). Of these studies, the variant was found in individuals who either had MLH1 deficient immunohistochemistry or MSI positive tumors (Halvarsson 2005, Poley 2007, Lagerstedt Robinson 2007), increasing the likelihood this variant is pathogenic. In one family, the variant segregated with disease (Tannergard 1995). The p.Met35 residue is conserved across mammals and other vertebrate species, and computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD) predict a deleterious impact on protein function. Although this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity, functional studies have shown that the p.Met35Arg variant showed a reduction in repair capacity compared to the wild-type protein (Lastella 2006, Takahashi_2007_17510385, Shcherbakova_1999_10082584, Kondo_2003_12810663), increasing the likelihood that an alteration to this residue is pathogenic. In addition, this variant has not been observed in more than 1200 proband chromosomes sequenced for the MLH1 gene by our laboratory, increasing the likelihood, this is a rare variant of clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as pathogenic. -
Lynch syndrome Pathogenic:1
Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability >0.99 -
not provided Pathogenic:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The p.M35R pathogenic mutation (also known as c.104T>G), located in coding exon 1 of the MLH1 gene, results from a T to G substitution at nucleotide position 104. The methionine at codon 35 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. This mutation, designated Met35>Arg (ATG>AGG), segregated with disease in a Swedish family meeting Amsterdam criteria (Tannergård P et al. Cancer Res. 1995 Dec;55:6092-6) and was identified in an individual with HNPCC whose two adenomas with low grade dysplasia demonstrated absent MLH1 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry (Halvarsson B et al. Mod. Pathol. 2005 Aug;18:1095-101). In yeast functional assays, the M35R variant showed a mutator phenotype when compared to wild type suggesting inactivation of mismatch repair (Shcherbakova PV et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999 Apr;19:3177-83). In a yeast two-hybrid assay, M35R displayed almost no beta-galactosidase activity similar to known deleterious alterations (Kondo E et al. Cancer Res. 2003 Jun;63:3302-8). Additionally, the M35R variant demonstrated no dominant mutator effect in reporter assays in yeast, which is consistent with pathogenicity (Shimodaira H et al. Nat Genet. 1998 Aug;19(4):384-9; Takahashi M et al. Cancer Res. 2007 May;67:4595-604). This alteration has been classified as pathogenic using the following lines of evidence: in silico prediction models, segregation with disease, clinical phenotype including tumor characteristics, mutation co-occurrence, and functional studies (Thompson BA et al. Hum. Mutat. 2013 Jan;34:200-9; Thompson BA et al. Nat. Genet. 2014 Feb;46:107-15; available at [www.insight-group.org/variants/classifications/]). In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by MAPP-MMR in silico analyses (Chao EC et al. Hum. Mutat. 2008 Jun;29:852-60). Based on the supporting evidence, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at