3-37001046-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.299G>C(p.Arg100Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 27
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Pathogenic:2
This variant is considered likely pathogenic. Functional studies indicate this variant impacts protein function [PMID: 17510385]. This variant is expected to disrupt protein structure [Myriad internal data]. -
A heterozygous missense variation in exon 3 of the MLH1 gene in the amino acid substitution of Proline for Arginine at codon 100 was detected. The observed variant c.299G>C(p.Arg100Pro) has not been reported in the 1000 genomes, gnomAD databases. The in silico predictions# of the variant are probably damaging by PolyPhen-2 (HumDiv), damaging by SIFT, LRT and Mutation Taster2 tools. The reference codon is conserved across species. -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer Pathogenic:1
Variant summary: MLH1 c.299G>C (p.Arg100Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein family, N-terminal domain (IPR002099) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251360 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.299G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome (Yanus_2020) and hereditary colorectal cancer (Raskin_2017). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. Several publications have demonstrated that the variant has a deleterious impact on protein activity (Takahashi_2007, Thompson_2020), resulting in high mutation rates in a yeast mutation burden assay (Wanat_2007). Recent multifactorial likelihood analysis gave a posterior probability value of 1, classifying the variant as "pathogenic" (Thompson_2020). Three ClinVar submitters (including one expert panel: inSiGHT) have assessed the variant since 2014: two submitters (including the expert panel) classified the variant as pathogenic, and one as likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
Lynch syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
Class 5 - Pathogenic Classification using multifactorial probability: 1 -
not provided Pathogenic:1
- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Pathogenic:1
This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). Based on a multifactorial likelihood algorithm using genetic, in silico, and/or statistical data, this variant has been determined to have a high probability of being pathogenic (PMID: 32849802). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site, but this prediction has not been confirmed by published transcriptional studies. Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects MLH1 protein function (PMID: 17210669, 17510385, 31697235). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 29212164, 22949387). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 90133). This sequence change replaces arginine with proline at codon 100 of the MLH1 protein (p.Arg100Pro). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between arginine and proline. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at