3-37007004-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 3P and 10B. PM1PP3BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.394G>C​(p.Asp132His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,613,602 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D132G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

6
10
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.67

Publications

35 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
MLH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Lynch syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 13 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 43 uncertain in NM_000249.4
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17604923).
BP6
Variant 3-37007004-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-37007004-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 17096.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000249.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MLH1
NM_000249.4
MANE Select
c.394G>Cp.Asp132His
missense
Exon 5 of 19NP_000240.1
MLH1
NM_001354628.2
c.394G>Cp.Asp132His
missense
Exon 5 of 18NP_001341557.1
MLH1
NM_001354629.2
c.295G>Cp.Asp99His
missense
Exon 4 of 18NP_001341558.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MLH1
ENST00000231790.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.394G>Cp.Asp132His
missense
Exon 5 of 19ENSP00000231790.3
MLH1
ENST00000456676.7
TSL:1
c.394G>Cp.Asp132His
missense
Exon 5 of 17ENSP00000416687.3
MLH1
ENST00000413740.2
TSL:1
c.394G>Cp.Asp132His
missense
Exon 5 of 15ENSP00000416476.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000215
AC:
54
AN:
251384
AF XY:
0.000199
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000347
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000108
AC:
158
AN:
1461468
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000103
AC XY:
75
AN XY:
727062
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000380
AC:
17
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00337
AC:
88
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53398
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000288
AC:
32
AN:
1111656
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000348
AC:
21
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
18
26
35
44
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74284
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41434
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000589
AC:
9
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00288
AC:
10
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.523
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000266
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000200
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000198
AC:
24
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:14Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:2Benign:3
Jan 24, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: This variant has been reported multiple times in HGMD, with conflicting evidence. A recent paper claims that it may be pathogenic (as predicted by a computational tool developed by the authors). The variant is classified in ClinVar as Benign by an expert panel (3 stars) in 2013 and as Likely benign by 3 additional submitters (GeneDx, Invitae, Ambry) in 2015/2016. MaxMAF is 0.06% in ExAC (high for disease prevalence)

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Nov 17, 2015
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 07, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MLH1 c.394G>C (p.Asp132His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the N-terminal domain (IPR002099) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 251384 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0032 within the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Ashkenazi Jewish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer phenotype (0.00071), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism. In addition, the variant was reported with an even higher allele frequency in the Chinese population (in 8/150 healthy controls, i.e. with an allele frequency of 2.6%), suggesting that the variant is also frequent polymorphism in the Chinese population (Mei_2006). On the other hand, the variant c.394G>C, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer and other cancer phenotypes (e.g. Lipkin_2004, Tao_2009, Khairunnisa_2018, Dorling_2021, Perez-Cabornero_2009, Frey_2017), however these data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. In one case, the variant was reported in a daughter with colorectal cancer but not in the mother who had endometrial cancer (Khairunnisa_2018), indicating lack of segregation of the variant with disease. In addition, a co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (MLH1 c.1852_1854delAAG, p.Lys618del; in the UMD database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In a case-control study, the variant was found to confer susceptibility to colorectal cancer in an Israeli population (Lipkin_2004). In this cohort, patients with the variant usually did not have MSI, tended to be older, had fewer multiple primary tumors and had fewer first degree relatives affected with HNPCC-spectrum patients. A second case-control study in a Chinese cohort also found the variant to be associated with sporadic colorectal cancer (Tao_2009). However, another case-control study in a Chinese cohort indicated the variant not to be associated and to be a nonfunctional polymorphism in the Chinese population (Mei_2006). In functional studies, MMR activity of the variant was reported to be similar to wild-type (Plotz_2006, Martinez_2010, Takahashi_2007), however the variant was reported to reduce ATPase activity (Lipkin_2004). Nine ClinVar submitters have assessed this variant since 2014, and two classified the variant as of uncertain significance, five as likely benign, and 2 as benign. In summary, though the variant might result in attenuated protein function, and could be potentially associated with a low risk for colorectal cancer, but does not segregate with the disease and therefore is not associated with Lynch syndrome. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Nov 26, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:4
Aug 20, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19504447, 17135187, 28050887, 20176959, 17510385, 19250818, 17074586, 16685411, 15991064, 17417778, 15184898, 18383312, 18547406, 15358723, 19665066, 25871441, 23741719, 19364498, 26296696, 27181684, 23588873, 28495237, 29505604, 30840782, 30370249, 30998989)

Jul 06, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MLH1: BS3:Moderate, BS1

Nov 13, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jan 26, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Jun 17, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 21, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Nov 19, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 27363726]. This variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease.

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Aug 24, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Colorectal cancer, sporadic, susceptibility to Other:1
Jul 01, 2004
OMIM
Significance:risk factor
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.69
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.069
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.18
CADD
Pathogenic
29
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.79
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.52
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.18
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M
PhyloP100
9.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.3
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.69
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.89
MVP
0.89
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
0.28
T
GERP RS
5.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.68
gMVP
0.86
Mutation Taster
=15/85
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28930073; hg19: chr3-37048495; API