3-37008839-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS1
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.479C>T(p.Ala160Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000421 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | c.479C>T | p.Ala160Val | missense_variant | 6/19 | ENST00000231790.8 | NP_000240.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | c.479C>T | p.Ala160Val | missense_variant | 6/19 | 1 | NM_000249.4 | ENSP00000231790 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000915 AC: 23AN: 251376Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135854
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000445 AC: 65AN: 1461756Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000674 AC XY: 49AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 11, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 10, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 18, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Aug 01, 2018 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 10, 2017 | This variant is denoted MLH1 c.479C>T at the cDNA level, p.Ala160Val (A160V) at the protein level,and results in the change of an Alanine to a Valine (GCC>GTC). This variant was observed in at least one individualwith a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps (Yurgelun 2015). One in vitro functionalstudy showed mismatch repair activity and protein expression comparable to wild-type (Takahashi 2007). MLH1Ala160Val was observed at an allele frequency of 0.103% (17/16500) in individuals of South Asian ancestry in largepopulation cohorts (NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, Lek 2016). SinceAlanine and Valine share similar properties, this is considered a conservative amino acid substitution. MLH1 Ala160Valoccurs at a position that is not conserved and is located within the N-terminal ATPase domain (Andersen 2012). TheInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours Incorporated (InSiGHT) classifies this variant as uncertainbased on insufficient evidence for classification (Thompson 2014). In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding theeffect this variant may have on protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclearwhether MLH1 Ala160Val is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance - |
MLH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 20, 2024 | The MLH1 c.479C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala160Val. This variant has been reported in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome (Yurgelun et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25980754. Table S2; Tsaousis et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31159747. Table S5). Functional studies have shown this variant was neutral and non damaging for mismatch repair (Bouvet D et al 2019. PubMed ID: 30998989). An additional study showed there was normal function of the protein but mismatch repair activity was reduced to 80% of wild type (Takahashi M et al 2007. PubMed ID: 17510385). This variant is reported in 0.075% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. In ClinVar, this variant has conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/90244/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Nov 20, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at