3-37042336-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1731+5G>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 28
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The c.1731+5G>C intronic variant results from a G to C substitution 5 nucleotides after coding exon 15 in the MLH1 gene. This alteration has been detected in individuals with colorectal tumors displaying absent MLH1 and PMS2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry, normal MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and wild type for BRAF (Ambry internal data). In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site; however, direct evidence is unavailable. A different alteration at the same position (c.1731+5G>A) has been shown to result in skipping of exon 15 with no full-length expression from this variant allele based on reporter minigene assays and RT-PCR analysis of patient RNA (Naruse H, Fam. Cancer 2009; 8(4):509-17; Tournier I, Hum. Mutat. 2008 Dec; 29(12):1412-24). Although c.1731+5G>C has not been directly studied it is predicted to have a similar impact on splicing. This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.