3-37048952-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM5PP3
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):āc.2038T>Gā(p.Cys680Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000349 in 1,461,838 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C680R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000716 AC: 18AN: 251246Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000957 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135780
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000349 AC: 51AN: 1461838Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000495 AC XY: 36AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:5
A Heterozygous missense variation in exon 18 of the MLH1 gene that results in the amino acid substitution of Glycine for Cysteine at codon 680 was detected. The observed variant c.2038T>G (p.Cys680Gly) has previously been reported in the patient affected with colorectal cancer and it is documented as likely pathogenic in InSiGHT and ClinVar database. The p.Cys680Gly variant has not been reported in the 1000 Genomes and has a minor allele frequency of 0.01% in the ExAC databases. The in silico predictions of the variant are damaging by SIFT, LRT and MutationTaster2 tools. The reference codon is conserved across mammals. In summary, the variant meets our criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic. -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
- -
The missense c.2038T>G(p.Cys680Gly) variant in MLH1 gene has been reported in heterozygous state in individuals affected with MLH1 related disorders (Rajkumar T, et. al., 2004; Dominguez-Valentin M, et. al., 2014; Mittal A, et. al., 2022). The variant is reported with an allele frequency of 0.007% in the gnomAD exomes database and is novel (not in any individuals) in 1000 Genomes database. This variant has been reported to the ClinVar database as Likely Benign/Likely Pathogenic/Uncertain Significance (multiple submissions). The amino acid change p.Cys680Gly in MLH1 is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. The amino acid Cys at position 680 is changed to a Gly changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
This missense variant replaces cysteine with glycine at codon 680 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with three Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (PMID: 15345113). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was not reported in affected cases and reported in four healthy controls (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 18/251246 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). A different missense mutation at the same codon, p.Cys680Arg, has been reported in multiple individuals and families affected with Lynch syndrome (PMID: 18931482, 23729658, 25077178, 27601186) and shown in a functional study to be defective in DNA mismatch repair in vitro (PMID: 25077178). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:2
- -
This missense variant replaces cysteine with glycine at codon 680 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with three Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (PMID: 15345113). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was not reported in affected cases and reported in four healthy controls (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 18/251246 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). A different missense mutation at the same codon, p.Cys680Arg, has been reported in multiple individuals and families affected with Lynch syndrome (PMID: 18931482, 23729658, 25077178, 27601186) and shown in a functional study to be defective in DNA mismatch repair in vitro (PMID: 25077178). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: MLH1 c.2038T>G (p.Cys680Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1, C-terminal domain (IPR032189) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.2e-05 in 251246 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Lynch Syndrome (7.2e-05 vs 0.00071), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.2038T>G has been reported in the literature as a variant of probable significance in one individual with MSI-high colorectal tumor, a personal and family history of HNPCC-related cancers who was reportedly genotyped only for MLH1 and MSH2 genes (example Rajkumar_2004, cited in Bhai_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (Likely pathogenic, n=1; VUS, n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18383312, 15345113, 36200007, 12799449, 20533529, 22753075) -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at