3-37049015-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 4P and 16B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.2101C>A​(p.Gln701Lys) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000951 in 1,609,572 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q701H) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000083 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

2
4
13
Splicing: ADA: 0.02623
2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:4B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 3 benign, 16 uncertain in NM_000249.4
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr3-37049017-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 90049.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0071430206).
BP6
Variant 3-37049015-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-37049015-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 90042.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr3-37049015-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr3-37049015-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic]. Variant chr3-37049015-C-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00021 (32/152288) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00579 (30/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00416. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 21 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MLH1NM_000249.4 linkc.2101C>A p.Gln701Lys missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 18 of 19 ENST00000231790.8 NP_000240.1 P40692-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH1ENST00000231790.8 linkc.2101C>A p.Gln701Lys missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 18 of 19 1 NM_000249.4 ENSP00000231790.3 P40692-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000210
AC:
32
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000491
AC:
123
AN:
250694
AF XY:
0.000443
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00665
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000830
AC:
121
AN:
1457284
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000744
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
725328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33388
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00280
AC:
111
AN:
39672
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86160
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5754
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1107818
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000133
AC:
8
AN:
60258
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
18
28
37
46
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000210
AC:
32
AN:
152288
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00579
AC:
30
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
5
7
9
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00000451
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000268
ExAC
AF:
0.000453
AC:
55
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:17
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:2Benign:3
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 27, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 27363726]. -

Mar 18, 2016
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 20, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The missense variant NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.2101C>A (p.Gln701Lys) causes a change at the same amino acid residue as a previously established pathogenic variant. Additionally, the variant has been reported to ClinVar as Likely benign with a status of (3 stars) reviewed by expert panel (Variation ID 90042 as of 2024-10-03). The variant is observed in one or more well-documented healthy adults. The p.Gln701Lys missense variant is predicted to be damaging by both SIFT and PolyPhen2. The nucleotide c.2101 in MLH1 is predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Benign -

Jun 29, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Apr 27, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

Co-occurrence without CMMRD phenotype & MAF 0.01-1%. Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability 0.001-0.049 -

Sep 23, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 14, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
May 18, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16929514, 30521064, 23760103, 17011982, 18931482, 18726168, 18383312, 24933000, 22136435, 22995991, 18094436, 26811195, 23431106, 26900293, 26078562, 24710284, 23047549, 26332594, 29192238, 29050249, 25338684, 25479140, 29360550, 30093976, 31784484) -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MLH1 p.Gln701Lys variant was identified in 17 of 1894 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from individuals or families with Lynch syndrome or gastric cancer and was present in 3 of 1818 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Chen 2013, Fan 2007, Sheng 2008, Talseth-Palmer 2016, Yap 2009, Zhang 2006, Zhi 2011). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs63750114) as "With Pathogenic, other allele", ClinVar (3x likely benign including InSiGHT expert panel, 2x benign, 2x uncertain significance), Clinvitae (4x), Cosmic (1x, confirmed somatic, in adenocarcinoma of large intestine), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (10x, Likely not pathogenic/little clinical significance), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (4x), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (11x). The variant was not identified in MutDB or the UMD-LSDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 129 of 276412 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0005 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 23994 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Other in 2 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), and East Asian in 126 of 18826 chromosomes (freq: 0.007). The variant was not observed in the Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, or South Asian populations. A functional study utilizing a yeast two-hybrid assay showed that MLH1 p.Gln701Lys interacts with PMS2 at reduced efficiency (16.6% relative activity in comparison with wild-type MLH1) (Fan 2007). In the same study, a co-immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated p.Gln701Lys retains 70% interaction with PMS2 (Fan 2007). Thus, the functional studies do not show consistent results. A study by Zhi 2011 found that the c.2101C>A genotype was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (OR = 8.42, 95% CI = 1.04-68.06) in Chinese males. The p.Gln701 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The p.Gln701Lys variant occurs in the 3rd last base of the exon. This position has been shown to be part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving this position sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Feb 10, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
-
Ding PR Lab, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Apr 29, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MLH1 c.2101C>A (p.Gln701Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1, C-terminal domain of the encoded protein sequence that is necessary for interaction with PSM2 (Fan_2007). Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0005 in 251174 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication data), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0066 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00071), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. This variant has been reported in multiple sequencing studies among individuals of East Asian ancestry with a variety of cancers to include, Lynch Syndrome, biliary tract cancer and colon cancer (Zhi_2011, Talseth-Palmer_2016, Chan_2018, Kim_2017, Wardell_2018). Thus, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. In addition, at-least one co-occurrence with the other potentially pathogenic variant (MLH1 c.208-1G>A) has been reported, providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Sheng_2008). A functional study demonstrated the variant to retain about 70% of its ability to interact with PMS2 (Fan_2007). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS (n=2), likely benign (n=2), and benign (n=2)). One expert panel (InSiGHT) has submitted clinical-significance assessment for this variant to ClinVar before 2014 and classified the variant as likely benign. As all of the evidence outlined above, spanning over a decade supports a non-pathogenic outcome, the variant was classified as benign. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Feb 25, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Muir-Torré syndrome;C1333991:Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2;C5399763:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 29, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MLH1-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 27, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.15
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.45
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.58
D;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.035
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
T;T;.;.;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.038
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0071
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.29
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
4.7
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.56
N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.52
Sift
Benign
0.90
T;D;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.92
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.10
B;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.83
MVP
0.99
MPC
0.088
ClinPred
0.039
T
GERP RS
4.9
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.63
Mutation Taster
=5/95
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.026
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.15
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Loading publications...

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63750114; hg19: chr3-37090506; COSMIC: COSV51617331; API