3-38306454-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001320033.2(SLC22A14):c.428C>T(p.Ser143Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000836 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S143Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001320033.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001320033.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC22A14 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.428C>T | p.Ser143Phe | missense | Exon 2 of 11 | ENSP00000396283.1 | Q9Y267 | ||
| SLC22A14 | TSL:1 | c.428C>T | p.Ser143Phe | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000273173.4 | Q9Y267 | ||
| SLC22A14 | TSL:4 | c.32C>T | p.Ser11Phe | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000442528.1 | F5H7H1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000183 AC: 46AN: 251402 AF XY: 0.000243 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000889 AC: 130AN: 1461802Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 88AN XY: 727210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74472 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at