Menu
GeneBe

3-38550362-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 3P and 5B. PM5PP2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):c.6010T>C(p.Phe2004Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00352 in 1,534,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F2004S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:19O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0740
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr3-38550362-A-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, SCN5A
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005137861).
BP6
Variant 3-38550362-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38550362-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48315.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=12, Uncertain_significance=7, Benign=4, not_provided=1}. Variant chr3-38550362-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6010T>C p.Phe2004Leu missense_variant 28/28 ENST00000413689.6
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.6007T>C p.Phe2003Leu missense_variant 28/28 ENST00000423572.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.6010T>C p.Phe2004Leu missense_variant 28/285 NM_001099404.2 P4
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.6007T>C p.Phe2003Leu missense_variant 28/281 NM_000335.5 A1Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00216
AC:
321
AN:
148396
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000399
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00410
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00384
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000995
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00198
AC:
389
AN:
195994
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00208
AC XY:
215
AN XY:
103328
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000949
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00369
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000885
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000888
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00459
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00366
AC:
5071
AN:
1385538
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00371
AC XY:
2520
AN XY:
678810
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000284
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00349
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000514
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000989
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00429
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00390
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00217
AC:
322
AN:
148514
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00191
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
72592
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000398
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00410
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00384
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000983
Alfa
AF:
0.00278
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00227
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00363
AC:
14
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000497
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00311
AC:
26
ExAC
AF:
0.00190
AC:
227

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:19Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:9Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 04, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 33131149, 31737537, 31043699, 31337358, 29672598, 29728395, 28359509, 27711072, 18456723, 17605181, 15851227, 20129283, 23414114, 23465283, 17210841, 22685113) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 11, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2023SCN5A: BP4 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 20, 2022- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJun 19, 2015- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyCardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust-This variant has been reported in the following publications (PMID:15851227;PMID:17210839;PMID:18071069;PMID:18456723;PMID:19841300;PMID:17605181;PMID:20129283). -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 07, 2020Variant summary: SCN5A c.6010T>C (p.Phe2004Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0021 in 213020 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 21- fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SCN5A causing Arrhythmia phenotype (0.0001), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.6010T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with sudden death, cardiomyopathies, Long-QT syndrome, and myocarditis (examples: Arnestead_2007, Belkaya_2017, Petrikin_2018, Marcondes_2018, Raju_2019, Mahdieh_2020), but also in healthy controls (examples: Kapplinger_2010, Ghouse_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. At least one publication reports experimental evidence indicating that the variant could affect SCN5A function (example: Wang_2007), however a large Danish population study did not identify an association between this variant and cardiac conditions (Ghouse_2017). 12 other ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cited the variant as uncertain significance (n=4) and benign/ likely benign (n=8). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 19, 2012Phe2004Leu in exon 28 of SCN5A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (21/6776) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs41311117). Phe2004Leu in exon 28 of SCN5A (rs41311117; allele frequency = 0.3%, 21/6776) ** -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteFeb 23, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 17, 2014- -
Brugada syndrome 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter For Human Genetics And Laboratory Diagnostics, Dr. Klein, Dr. Rost And ColleaguesDec 07, 2017- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoJan 10, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 03, 2021- -
Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Long QT syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Long QT syndrome;C1142166:Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 20, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 30, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 08, 2018- -
Long QT syndrome 3;C4551804:Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaMay 11, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.28
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
Cadd
Benign
6.2
Dann
Benign
0.76
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.89
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.26
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0051
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.44
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.63
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.66
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;B;.;B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.10
MutPred
0.77
.;.;Loss of glycosylation at S2007 (P = 0.1612);.;.;Loss of glycosylation at S2007 (P = 0.1612);.;.;.;
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.60
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
-1.6
Varity_R
0.056
gMVP
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41311117; hg19: chr3-38591853; COSMIC: COSV99048691; COSMIC: COSV99048691; API