Variant 3-38557234-C-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP6

Variant 3-38557234-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38557234-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 463336.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=7}. Variant chr3-38557234-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN5A	NM_001099404.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.4296G>A	p.Arg1432=	synonymous_variant	24/28	ENST00000413689.6	NP_001092874.1
SCN5A	NM_000335.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.4293G>A	p.Arg1431=	synonymous_variant	24/28	ENST00000423572.7	NP_000326.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SCN5A	ENST00000413689.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.4296G>A	p.Arg1432=	synonymous_variant	24/28	5	NM_001099404.2	ENSP00000410257	P4
SCN5A	ENST00000423572.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.4293G>A	p.Arg1431=	synonymous_variant	24/28	1	NM_000335.5	ENSP00000398266	A1	Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

5

AN:

152214

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

33

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000200

AC:

5

AN:

250286

Hom.:

0

AF XY:

0.0000369

AC XY:

5

AN XY:

135592

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000353

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000376

AC:

55

AN:

1461608

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

30

AF XY:

0.0000371

AC XY:

27

AN XY:

727104

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000387

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

5

AN:

152214

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

33

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

1

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

0

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Brugada syndrome 1

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 18, 2019	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	in vitro;research	Roden Lab, Vanderbilt University Medical Center	-	We classified this variant using data from the calibrated functional assay 'ParSE-seq' (PMID: 37732247), population data, and in silico data within the ACMG v3 framework (PMID: 25741868)The SCN5A variant, 3-38557234-C-T was evaluated for association with the loss-of-function condition Brugada Syndrome.This Variant had an AF of 0.0000328 in gnomAD v3The in silico predictor SpliceAI scored the variant as 0.434512; normal <0.2, likely damaging >0.5.Using the functional RNA-splicing assay, ParSE-seq, the variant was evaluated to have no impact on splicing (BS3_strong) following the Brnich et al. calibration framework (PMID: 31892348). We do not apply benign splicing functional data to missense variants. In aggregate, we therefore classify this variant as VUS using these collective data. -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 18, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 18, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Sick sinus syndrome 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 18, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 18, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Long QT syndrome 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 18, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Feb 05, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 03, 2024

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 08, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Nov 14, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.29

CADD

Benign

14

DANN

Benign

0.72

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.32

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.32

Position offset: 50

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

3-38557234-C-T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over