3-38603887-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):​c.1715C>A​(p.Ala572Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00345 in 1,613,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 55 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A572F) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0040 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 48 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:27O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.497

Publications

56 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SCN5A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • familial long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • long QT syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • sick sinus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • progressive familial heart block, type 1A
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • atrial standstill
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial atrial fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial sick sinus syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • progressive familial heart block
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002438426).
BP6
Variant 3-38603887-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38603887-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 67683.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00397 (605/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00291 (198/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 7 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 392 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 SD,AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001099404.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SCN5A
NM_001099404.2
MANE Plus Clinical
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28NP_001092874.1
SCN5A
NM_000335.5
MANE Select
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28NP_000326.2
SCN5A
NM_198056.3
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28NP_932173.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SCN5A
ENST00000413689.6
TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28ENSP00000410257.1
SCN5A
ENST00000423572.7
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28ENSP00000398266.2
SCN5A
ENST00000333535.9
TSL:1
c.1715C>Ap.Ala572Asp
missense
Exon 12 of 28ENSP00000328968.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00397
AC:
605
AN:
152206
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00491
AC:
1222
AN:
248994
AF XY:
0.00460
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000258
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000521
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00546
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00339
AC:
4960
AN:
1461628
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00322
AC XY:
2343
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000514
AC:
23
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0378
AC:
2018
AN:
53336
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
2705
AN:
1111858
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00338
AC:
204
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
296
592
888
1184
1480
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
100
200
300
400
500
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00397
AC:
605
AN:
152324
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00526
AC XY:
392
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
11
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000523
AC:
8
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0363
AC:
385
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00291
AC:
198
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
31
61
92
122
153
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00159
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00119
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000245
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00239
AC:
20
ExAC
AF:
0.00429
AC:
519
EpiCase
AF:
0.00169
EpiControl
AF:
0.00231

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:8
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 03, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN5A: BS1, BS2

Apr 22, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23008441, 22378279, 20403459, 12820704, 27243970, 27153395, 27287068, 27930701, 18452873, 28781330, 29672598, 29214556, 28988457, 29032884, 32880476)

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:5
Dec 11, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The SCN5A c.1715C>A (p.Ala572Asp) variant located in the cytoplasmic region between domains I and II of Nav1.5 (Ortiz-Bonnin_2016) involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). Functional studies show the variant could have a gain-of-function implication (Ortiz-Bonin_2016), an affect on recovery time (Albert_2008), or acts like wild type SCN5A, although in the context of a certain genotype such as the SCN5A polymorphism H588R moderate dysfunction was observed (Tester_2010). Overall, the authors indicate that the variant is not associated with the LQTS phenotype. This variant was found in 1486/279922 control chromosomes (23 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.038676 (997/25778). This frequency is about 387 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SCN5A variant (0.0001), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. Multiple publications have cited the variant of interest in affected individuals. One family reported by Paulussen_2003 found the variant to be in two unaffected family members, with the proband carrying the variant and another pathogenic KCNQ1 variant, V254M, while Ortiz-Bonnin_2016 reported an affected family member that did not carry the variant of interest. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Taken together, based on reports of co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in another gene, lack of co-segregation with disease phenotype, and an unexpectedly high frequency in controls, this variant is classified as benign, although the possibility of a modifier effect in certain genetic backgrounds cannot be ruled out.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 12, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ala572Asp in exon 12 of SCN5A: This variant was identified in 3.9% (257/6618) Finnish chromosomes including 5 homozygous individuals by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs36210423) and was re ported at slightly lower frequencies in control cohorts across multiple studies investigating the genetic cause of LQTS and related clinical entities (Mank-Seym our 2006, Arnestad 2007, Albert 2008, Tester 2010). There is a possibility that the p.Ala572Asp variant may have a minor impact on protein function (Albert 2008 , Tester 2010, Koval 2012); however, these in vitro assays may not accurately re present biological function. Although a modifying role in disease cannot be full y excluded, this variant is likely benign.

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Aug 29, 2014
Blueprint Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Cardiac arrest Benign:1
Aug 29, 2014
Blueprint Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Aug 16, 2017
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Mar 03, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME;C1832680:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E;C1837845:Sick sinus syndrome 1;C1859062:Long QT syndrome 3;C1879286:Progressive familial heart block, type 1A;C2751898:Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1;C3151464:Atrial fibrillation, familial, 10;C4551804:Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Sep 06, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Aug 29, 2014
Blueprint Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Oct 01, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Long QT syndrome 3 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 19, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:12354768;PMID:12820704;PMID:15466642;PMID:15840476;PMID:17161064;PMID:17210839;PMID:18071069;PMID:20403459). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.44
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.26
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.61
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.52
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0024
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L
PhyloP100
0.50
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.35
N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.44
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T
Polyphen
0.022
B
Vest4
0.38
MVP
0.48
MPC
0.64
ClinPred
0.015
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.098
gMVP
0.71
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs36210423; hg19: chr3-38645378; API